+1. Exactly what I think.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 11 March 2011, at 18:36:37 (+0100),
> Leif Middelschulte wrote:
>
> > Fair enough. Many of the said things are already part of the commit
> guidlines.
> >
> > Cases to sort out:
> > - In cases where t
On Friday, 11 March 2011, at 13:04:37 (-0500),
Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > If any of this has changed, raster needs to be the one to change it.
I apologize. I realized after I sent this that it could be
misinterpreted to mean, "Don't discuss it." That's not what I meant.
What I meant was, if y
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:54:46 -0800
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 11 March 2011, at 18:36:37 (+0100),
> Leif Middelschulte wrote:
>
> > Fair enough. Many of the said things are already part of the commit
> > guidlines.
> >
> > Cases to sort out:
> > - In cases where the maintainer and the
On Friday, 11 March 2011, at 18:36:37 (+0100),
Leif Middelschulte wrote:
> Fair enough. Many of the said things are already part of the commit guidlines.
>
> Cases to sort out:
> - In cases where the maintainer and the community e.g. ML disagree:
> who has the last word?
For the specific product
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Stephen Houston wrote:
> Obviously the maintainer has the last word since he/she has the ability to
> pull it out of svn whenever.
> Yes the spirit is fix and improve. Not rewrite or remove!
Hum, it's well in the spirit of this community to rewrite
Hello everyone,
As of recent events, I want to poll the developers' perception on
"Private projects in e.svn.org".
Some developers were suprised that their projects (which were in
trunk) were (re)moved/rewritten/majorly changed by other developers of
our community.
Both sides came up with reasonab
