On Friday 27 August 2004 04:30 pm, Shish wrote:
Which reminds me of something - why is it the app's job to decide which
display engine to use? I would have thought it better to have a generic
window_get() function for the apps to call, and based on the user
config, it either returns a
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:30:02 + Shish [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Log Message:
added ecore_evas_gl_x11_window_get()
Is this not redundant? It doesn't do anything different from
software_x11_window_get() as far as I can see. Feels like unneeded bloat.
Yes,
Ibukun Olumuyiwa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-27 16:38]:
On Fri 27 Aug 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : tsauerbeck
Project : e17
Module : libs/ecore
Dir : e17/libs/ecore/src/lib/ecore_evas
Modified Files:
Ecore_Evas.h.in
Log Message:
added ecore_evas_gl_x11_window_get()
Is this not redundant? It doesn't do anything different from
software_x11_window_get() as far as I can see. Feels like unneeded bloat.
Yes, but the function name clearly indicates that its specific to the
engine that's used so it makes sense to
On Fri 27 Aug 2004, Shish wrote:
Log Message:
added ecore_evas_gl_x11_window_get()
Is this not redundant? It doesn't do anything different from
software_x11_window_get() as far as I can see. Feels like unneeded bloat.
Yes, but the function name clearly indicates that its specific to the
