On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
> Massimo Maiurana schrieb:
>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman), il 07/02/2010 14:36, scrisse:
>>
>>
>>> there is no need. just move to BROKEN. its harmless being there. if its
>>> your
>>> local disk space - then just check out the dirs u c
Massimo Maiurana schrieb:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman), il 07/02/2010 14:36, scrisse:
>
>
>> there is no need. just move to BROKEN. its harmless being there. if its your
>> local disk space - then just check out the dirs u care about.
>>
>>
>
> what about moving dirs like BROKEN and
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman), il 07/02/2010 14:36, scrisse:
> there is no need. just move to BROKEN. its harmless being there. if its your
> local disk space - then just check out the dirs u care about.
>
what about moving dirs like BROKEN and OLD to an upper level, so that everyone
can che
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:30:39 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> Hi all,
>
> Our SVN is huge, a real pain to:
> - checkout (for both newbies and core devs -- those that must
> checkout everything, so can grep to see what our core changes affect)
> - understand (for newbies, that also s
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
>>> - exml
>>
>> dependency of keyboard switcher module in E-MODULES-EXTRA. Compiles and
>> works. Please keep
>
> I don't see why kbd would use xml? Maybe it could be converted to eet?
> Anyway, exml is harmless last time I checked
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Adam Flott wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> - BINDINGS/perl (all except newly added Elementary?)
>
> I removed the old Imlib2 and Evas libraries as they were way out of
> date. Imlib2 is already maintained on CPAN and looks complete
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> - BINDINGS/perl (all except newly added Elementary?)
I removed the old Imlib2 and Evas libraries as they were way out of
date. Imlib2 is already maintained on CPAN and looks complete. I ended up
covering a majority of Evas since elementary_t
On Tuesday, 02 February 2010, at 18:30:39 (-0200),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> My current plan is to remove:
>- BROKEN/*
>- OLD/ all except etk and BINDINGS/python-etk -- no hard feelings
Etk is just as dead as everything else in OLD. It should be removed
as well.
>- imlib2_lo
I plan to keep maintaining Keys & Ardy. I wanted to keep Ardy and Keys
in there as good simple examples of Python-EFL. Someone could even add
more commenting into it and use it as a teaching example.
You could move them to MISC I suppose.
Toma.
On 3 February 2010 07:48, Dave Andreoli wrote:
>
2010/2/2 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> Hi all,
>
> Our SVN is huge, a real pain to:
>- checkout (for both newbies and core devs -- those that must
> checkout everything, so can grep to see what our core changes affect)
>- understand (for newbies, that also suffer from huge checkout time)
>
>
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
Our SVN is huge, a real p
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Our SVN is huge, a real pain to:
>>>- checkout (for both newbies and core devs -- those tha
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Quaker wrote:
> Hi Gustavo.. i have a few notes about that:
>
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:30:39
> -0200
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Our SVN is huge, a real pain to:
>> - checkout (for both newbies and core devs -- those that must
>> checkout everything
Hi Gustavo.. i have a few notes about that:
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:30:39
-0200
> Hi all,
>
> Our SVN is huge, a real pain to:
>- checkout (for both newbies and core devs -- those that must
> checkout everything, so can grep to see what our core changes affect)
>- und
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> My current plan is to remove:
> - BROKEN/*
> - OLD/ all except etk and BINDINGS/python-etk -- no hard feelings
> if everyone agrees to remove these as well
> - PROTO/eve (I'll add a proper webkit browser once webkit-efl is
> released l
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:59 -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote :
> What's good in keeping them? SVN's version of Attic? :-)
> Again, I see no other projects keeping attic stuff... see kde3 stuff,
> gnome, kernel... once things are gone, they're gone! just svn log will
> show they ever existed.
>
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Our SVN is huge, a real pain to:
>> - checkout (for both newbies and core devs -- those that must
>> checkout everything, so can grep to see what o
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
>
> - edje_viewer (is it working? I guess so... willing to keep it if
> it is working)
>
Working fine.
--
Tiago Rezende Campos Falcão
Developer @ ProFUSION Embedded Systems
---
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our SVN is huge, a real pain to:
> - checkout (for both newbies and core devs -- those that must
> checkout everything, so can grep to see what our core changes affect)
> - understand (for newbies, that also suffer
Emprint compiles just fine and is actively maintained by me.
PROTO/elm_* compiles just fine and is actively maintained by me.
dh
On 02/02/2010 03:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our SVN is huge, a real pain to:
> - checkout (for both newbies and core devs -- those that
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, André Dieb wrote:
> There's a possibility we ressurect OLD/evfs. Nowadays it doesn't compile
> (nobody migrated it to eina), but I myself am reading/changing the code to
> new eet/eina changes.
> This is just for the record. If you really want to delete it, I can ma
There's a possibility we ressurect OLD/evfs. Nowadays it doesn't compile
(nobody migrated it to eina), but I myself am reading/changing the code to
new eet/eina changes.
This is just for the record. If you really want to delete it, I can maintain
a local copy and commit it when it's working.
On T
Hi all,
Our SVN is huge, a real pain to:
- checkout (for both newbies and core devs -- those that must
checkout everything, so can grep to see what our core changes affect)
- understand (for newbies, that also suffer from huge checkout time)
The amount of legacy that not even compiles is
23 matches
Mail list logo
