Hello.
On 17/06/16 08:06, Simon Lees wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2016 07:16 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 16/06/16 03:34, Simon Lees wrote:
>>> On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
writ
Hello.
On 17/06/16 08:06, Simon Lees wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2016 07:16 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 16/06/16 03:34, Simon Lees wrote:
>>> On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
writ
On 06/16/2016 07:16 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 16/06/16 03:34, Simon Lees wrote:
>>
>> On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
>>> write here as our servers had been overloaded at that p
Hello.
On 16/06/16 03:34, Simon Lees wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
>> write here as our servers had been overloaded at that point).
>>
>> While we have not been ready for an alpha relea
On 06/12/2016 09:11 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
> write here as our servers had been overloaded at that point).
>
> While we have not been ready for an alpha release I found it useful to
> get at least a snapshot
Hello.
I put together a tarball snapshot with what we had on Friday (did not
write here as our servers had been overloaded at that point).
While we have not been ready for an alpha release I found it useful to
get at least a snapshot out to allow packagers testing the many changes
we did regar
At 8:20pm, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 05/31/2010 08:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:53:50 -0400 Christopher
>> Michael
>> said:
>>
>>> On 05/31/2010 07:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher
On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:53:50 -0400 Christopher Michael
said:
> On 05/31/2010 07:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher
> > Michael said:
> >
> >> On 05/31/10 12:55, Christopher Michael wrote:
> >>> If we want users to have to hack any new
On 05/31/2010 08:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 19:53:50 -0400 Christopher Michael
> said:
>
>> On 05/31/2010 07:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher
>>> Michael said:
>>>
On 05/31/10 12:55, Chr
On 05/31/2010 07:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher Michael
> said:
>
>> On 05/31/10 12:55, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> If we want users to have to hack any new e.cfg files manually, then by
>>> all means, make a snapshot :P
>>>
>>> Si
On Mon, 31 May 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Christopher Michael
said:
> On 05/31/10 12:55, Christopher Michael wrote:
> > If we want users to have to hack any new e.cfg files manually, then by
> > all means, make a snapshot :P
> >
> > Since the wizard module does not start anymore on new configs (I'm not
On 05/31/10 12:55, Christopher Michael wrote:
> If we want users to have to hack any new e.cfg files manually, then by
> all means, make a snapshot :P
>
> Since the wizard module does not start anymore on new configs (I'm not
> even sure that it builds/installs either), then users who are new to
>
If we want users to have to hack any new e.cfg files manually, then by
all means, make a snapshot :P
Since the wizard module does not start anymore on new configs (I'm not
even sure that it builds/installs either), then users who are new to
using E (read: have no existing e.cfg at all) will get
13 matches
Mail list logo
