Mike Blumenkrantz - Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:56:45 -0500
>On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:59:02 +0100
>Michel Briand wrote:
>
>>
>> Mike Blumenkrantz - Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:32:57 -0500
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >eeze 1.1 has been "out" for several months now, but I have received no test
>> >reports. This is not ver
Mike Blumenkrantz - Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:32:57 -0500
>Hi,
>
>eeze 1.1 has been "out" for several months now, but I have received no test
>reports. This is not very motivating for writing an efm backend that does not
>require HAL/udisks!
>
>To help, try using any of the utils distributed: eeze_mou
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:59:02 +0100
Michel Briand wrote:
>
> Mike Blumenkrantz - Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:32:57 -0500
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >eeze 1.1 has been "out" for several months now, but I have received no test
> >reports. This is not very motivating for writing an efm backend that does
> >not require
Hi,
eeze 1.1 has been "out" for several months now, but I have received no test
reports. This is not very motivating for writing an efm backend that does not
require HAL/udisks!
To help, try using any of the utils distributed: eeze_mount, eeze_umount,
eeze_disk_ls. Note that eeze_mount is curre
