Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-12 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:26:59 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said: > I don't think it's the best option, but we're a community so I'll go with > whatever the majority (aka raster) decides. hahahahahah! but seriously - i went over this. the POINT of the changelog is to document the changes made for the P

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-05 Thread Tom Hacohen
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > to be more strict about commits on the core EFL (that is, those that have > been released as 1.0), maybe we could do like other projects: > > * create a patch ML > * never commit directly to svn but send the patch to that ML > * once some

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Thomas Gstädtner
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 20:46, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Friday, February 4, 2011, Thomas Gstädtner wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 16:17, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:58:13 +0100 Leif Middelschulte wrote: > 201

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Friday, February 4, 2011, Thomas Gstädtner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 16:17, Vincent Torri wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:58:13 +0100 >>> Leif Middelschulte wrote: >>> 2011/2/4 Vincent Torri : > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011,

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:50:24 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:37:59 +0100 (CET) > > Vincent Torri wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:17:48 +0100 (

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:37:59 +0100 (CET) > Vincent Torri wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:17:48 +0100 (CET) >>> Vincent Torri wrote: >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:37:59 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:17:48 +0100 (CET) > > Vincent Torri wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:58:13 +0100 >

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:17:48 +0100 (CET) > Vincent Torri wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:58:13 +0100 >>> Leif Middelschulte wrote: >>> 2011/2/4 Vincent Torri : > > > On Fr

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Thomas Gstädtner
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 16:17, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:58:13 +0100 >> Leif Middelschulte wrote: >> >>> 2011/2/4 Vincent Torri : On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:31

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:17:48 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:58:13 +0100 > > Leif Middelschulte wrote: > > > >> 2011/2/4 Vincent Torri : > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > >>> > O

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:58:13 +0100 > Leif Middelschulte wrote: > >> 2011/2/4 Vincent Torri : >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:31:12 +0100 Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:58:13 +0100 Leif Middelschulte wrote: > 2011/2/4 Vincent Torri : > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:31:12 +0100 > >> Cedric BAIL wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa > >>> wrote: >

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Leif Middelschulte
2011/2/4 Vincent Torri : > > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > >> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:31:12 +0100 >> Cedric BAIL wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa >>> wrote: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra writes: > Em 04-02-2011 11:34, Leif Middelschulte escr

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Vincent Torri writes: > >> Hey, >> >> to be more strict about commits on the core EFL (that is, those that have >> been released as 1.0), maybe we could do like other projects: >> >> * create a patch ML >> * never commit directly to svn but

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Vincent Torri writes: > Hey, > > to be more strict about commits on the core EFL (that is, those that have > been released as 1.0), maybe we could do like other projects: > > * create a patch ML > * never commit directly to svn but send the patch to that ML > * once someone has reviewed th

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:31:12 +0100 > Cedric BAIL wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa >> wrote: >>> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra writes: Em 04-02-2011 11:34, Leif Middelschulte escreveu: > Hey guys, > > a c

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:31:12 +0100 Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa > wrote: > > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra writes: > >> Em 04-02-2011 11:34, Leif Middelschulte escreveu: > >>> Hey guys, > >>> > >>> a couple of days ago I proposed a tag within commit messag

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra writes: >> Em 04-02-2011 11:34, Leif Middelschulte escreveu: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> a couple of days ago I proposed a tag within commit message, which can >>> be used later on to generate the changelog (over int

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra writes: > Em 04-02-2011 11:34, Leif Middelschulte escreveu: >> Hey guys, >> >> a couple of days ago I proposed a tag within commit message, which can >> be used later on to generate the changelog (over interval or check per >> commit). >> >> e.g.: >> CHANGELOG: added foo t

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Em 04-02-2011 11:34, Leif Middelschulte escreveu: > Hey guys, > > a couple of days ago I proposed a tag within commit message, which can > be used later on to generate the changelog (over interval or check per > commit). > > e.g.: > CHANGELOG: added foo to bar This seems pretty reasonable! Rui -

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Leif Middelschulte
Hey guys, a couple of days ago I proposed a tag within commit message, which can be used later on to generate the changelog (over interval or check per commit). e.g.: CHANGELOG: added foo to bar BR, Leif 2011/2/4 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra : > Em 04-02-2011 11:03, Cedric BAIL escreveu: >> Hi, >>

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Em 04-02-2011 11:03, Cedric BAIL escreveu: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> to be more strict about commits on the core EFL (that is, those that have >> been released as 1.0), maybe we could do like other projects: >> >> * create a patch ML >> * never commit d

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: to be more strict about commits on the core EFL (that is, those that have been released as 1.0), maybe we could do like other projects:  * create a patch ML  * never commit directly to svn but

Re: [E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Cedric BAIL
Hi, On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > to be more strict about commits on the core EFL (that is, those that have > been released as 1.0), maybe we could do like other projects: > >  * create a patch ML >  * never commit directly to svn but send the patch to that ML >  * once

[E-devel] commits policy

2011-02-04 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, to be more strict about commits on the core EFL (that is, those that have been released as 1.0), maybe we could do like other projects: * create a patch ML * never commit directly to svn but send the patch to that ML * once someone has reviewed the patch, one can commit it (the revie