Re: [E-devel] compiling E17

Am Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:33:43 +0100 schrieb Andreas Volz: > Hi, > > r66977 compiled with easy_e17.sh just failed: > > ../../src/lib/.libs/libelementary.so: undefined reference to > `ecore_evas_wayland_shm_resize' > > Any ideas? Searching through last SVN commits found this: Log: Ecore_Evas: Add

[E-devel] compiling E17

Hi, r66977 compiled with easy_e17.sh just failed: ../../src/lib/.libs/libelementary.so: undefined reference to `ecore_evas_wayland_shm_resize' Any ideas? regards Andreas -- Technical Blog

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:04:55 -0700 Michael Jennings said: > On Saturday, 18 April 2009, at 11:33:01 (+0100), > Andrew Williams wrote: > > > Is there a way to run only the preprocessor part of a c++ compiler? > > Usually, yes. With gcc/g++, it's -E, but will differ for other > compilers. th co

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

On Saturday, 18 April 2009, at 11:33:01 (+0100), Andrew Williams wrote: > Is there a way to run only the preprocessor part of a c++ compiler? Usually, yes. With gcc/g++, it's -E, but will differ for other compilers. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ Linux Ser

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

Is there a way to run only the preprocessor part of a c++ compiler? try cpp -xc++ the -x option can help you see http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Overall-Options.html#Overall-Options Vincent Cheers, Andrew On 15 Apr 2009, at 19:27, Michael Jennings wrote: On Wednesday, 15 April 2009,

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

Is there a way to run only the preprocessor part of a c++ compiler? Cheers, Andrew On 15 Apr 2009, at 19:27, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Wednesday, 15 April 2009, at 19:00:20 (+0100), > Andrew Williams wrote: > >> Hmm there is a nice sed script here: >> http://sed.sourceforge.net/grabbag/script

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

I'm a OS X user, can you provide instructions how to help? On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Andrew Williams wrote: > > -- Luchezar P. Petkov http://luchko.net -- Stay on

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Andrew Williams wrote: > Hmm there is a nice sed script here: > http://sed.sourceforge.net/grabbag/scripts/remccoms3.sed > > that works as far as I can see to strip both C and C++ comments - can > we assume an installation of sed? > > Or could it be called only on darwin (o

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

On Wednesday, 15 April 2009, at 19:00:20 (+0100), Andrew Williams wrote: > Hmm there is a nice sed script here: > http://sed.sourceforge.net/grabbag/scripts/remccoms3.sed > > that works as far as I can see to strip both C and C++ comments - can > we assume an installation of sed? > Or could it

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

Hmm there is a nice sed script here: http://sed.sourceforge.net/grabbag/scripts/remccoms3.sed that works as far as I can see to strip both C and C++ comments - can we assume an installation of sed? Or could it be called only on darwin (or other non c++ understanding distros)? Any thoughts wel

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

cpp is stripping comments I just found - but only strict ANSI, so the short comments // are being left in. I am trying to find some switches to change this behaviour but without much luck. Clearly specifying that try c comments must be used just because of this is no good, but the only other

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:41:18 +0100 Andrew Williams said: to me it sounds like comments are not being stripped by cpp... > Any more thoughts on this? > > Should I just commit the patch and forget about it, or do we need to > look closely at the edje parsing? > > On 14 Jan 2009, at 12:29, Andr

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

Any more thoughts on this? Should I just commit the patch and forget about it, or do we need to look closely at the edje parsing? On 14 Jan 2009, at 12:29, Andrew Williams wrote: > If I comment out all references it makes no difference (the > problematic things seem to be commented out alread

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

If I comment out all references it makes no difference (the problematic things seem to be commented out already?!) However, if I actually delete all the lines that reference this non- existant part (and also "increase" and "decrease") it compiles fine. Seems that for some reason the edje_cc on

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

OK, thanks to Vincent for talking to the gcc guys we got that solved - the _ was being added by gcc which put my searching off. This is now fixed - patch to be committed sortly. Now I am stuck again - with this error seemingly coming from e's data/ themes directory: /sw/bin/edje_cc -v -id ../.

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:26:22 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri babbled: > > Hey, > > It's nice to see you back :) > > > Am working on getting various bits of E working again on OSX and with > > the help of many here we now have all the required libs installed (I > > have a couple of lines still to com

Re: [E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

Hey, It's nice to see you back :) > Am working on getting various bits of E working again on OSX and with > the help of many here we now have all the required libs installed (I > have a couple of lines still to commit) but when compiling e17 itself > I find this peculiar message: > > ld: duplica

[E-devel] Compiling E17 on OSX

Hi there, Am working on getting various bits of E working again on OSX and with the help of many here we now have all the required libs installed (I have a couple of lines still to commit) but when compiling e17 itself I find this peculiar message: ld: duplicate symbol _e_configure_registry

Re: [E-devel] compiling e17 without dbus

Olivier SMEDTS, il 04/01/2009 19:48, scrisse: > Hello list, > > I'm trying to compile e17 (freshly checked out from public svn > repository) without dbus. > I have been using e17 from sources for years and am very happy with > it. I'm currently using enlightenment 0.16.999.050 (27 oct 2008) on > F

[E-devel] compiling e17 without dbus

Hello list, I'm trying to compile e17 (freshly checked out from public svn repository) without dbus. I have been using e17 from sources for years and am very happy with it. I'm currently using enlightenment 0.16.999.050 (27 oct 2008) on FreeBSD. I don't use, have or need dbus, hal and the like. Wh