* Michael Jennings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 July 2003, at 12:09:01 (-0400),
> Alan Schmitt wrote:
>
> > By the way, which libast should one use: the one at the top of the
> > cvs tree, or the one included in Eterm ?
>
> Well, since there isn't one included in Eterm, and since
On Wednesday, 30 July 2003, at 12:09:01 (-0400),
Alan Schmitt wrote:
> By the way, which libast should one use: the one at the top of the
> cvs tree, or the one included in Eterm ?
Well, since there isn't one included in Eterm, and since it isn't at
the top of any CVS tree, I'm not sure how to an
* Michael Jennings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 July 2003, at 10:50:53 (-0400),
> Alan Schmitt wrote:
>
> > After seeing the cvs log this morning I decided to upgrade my
> > eterm. It seem that the pserver cvs is no up to date, so I could not
> > get the latest changes (I guess I
On Wednesday, 30 July 2003, at 10:50:53 (-0400),
Alan Schmitt wrote:
> After seeing the cvs log this morning I decided to upgrade my
> eterm. It seem that the pserver cvs is no up to date, so I could not
> get the latest changes (I guess I can always apply them by hand). I
> also had a small probl
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:50:53AM -0400, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After seeing the cvs log this morning I decided to upgrade my eterm. It
> seem that the pserver cvs is no up to date, so I could not get the
> latest changes (I guess I can always apply them by hand). I also had
> a small p
Hi,
After seeing the cvs log this morning I decided to upgrade my eterm. It
seem that the pserver cvs is no up to date, so I could not get the
latest changes (I guess I can always apply them by hand). I also had
a small problem running configure, which I solved by removing a function
call:
[E
