On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:09:42 +0100 Michael Blumenkrantz
said:
> in applications? nothing.
and in e - same. nothing. checking every single one is a lot of work and abort
is unacceptable for a wm.
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:52 PM, rustyBSD wrote:
>
> > Le 04/09/2012 01:54, Carsten Haitzler (The
in applications? nothing.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:52 PM, rustyBSD wrote:
> Le 04/09/2012 01:54, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
> > agreed. if u abort() or segv() it makes little difference. for small data
> > structs (linked list nodes for example) its VERY hard to recover
> sensib
Le 04/09/2012 01:54, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
> agreed. if u abort() or segv() it makes little difference. for small data
> structs (linked list nodes for example) its VERY hard to recover sensibly from
> such an out-of-memory situation. but for large allocs its perfectly possible
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:45:58 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>> Really bad
>>
>> -1000
>
> agreed. if u abort() or segv() it makes little difference. for small data
> structs (linked list nodes for example) its VERY hard to recover s
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:45:58 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> Really bad
>
> -1000
agreed. if u abort() or segv() it makes little difference. for small data
structs (linked list nodes for example) its VERY hard to recover sensibly from
such an out-of-memory situation. but for large allocs
Really bad
-1000
On Monday, September 3, 2012, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Anyway the system will crash if it fails to allocate memory.
> But +1 here. Doing exception handling is a good practice.
>
> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:49 AM, rustyBSD >
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > in a
Anyway the system will crash if it fails to allocate memory.
But +1 here. Doing exception handling is a good practice.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:49 AM, rustyBSD wrote:
> Hi,
> in a lot of files, we use calloc(), malloc(),
> realloc(), ...
>
> Wouldn't it be good to have s
Hi,
in a lot of files, we use calloc(), malloc(),
realloc(), ...
Wouldn't it be good to have stuffs like g_malloc()
which aborts when it cannot allocate memory ?
Because there are a lot of un-null-checked calls,
which could be problematic...
---
