On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 02:18:45 -0800 Blake Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2006, at 9:24 PM, David Seikel wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:51:48 -0600 Brian Mattern
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:53:53AM -0600, Brian Mattern wrote:
> >>> On Thu
On Dec 7, 2006, at 9:24 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:51:48 -0600 Brian Mattern
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:53:53AM -0600, Brian Mattern wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 05:52:40PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:33:06 -06
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:51:48 -0600 Brian Mattern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:53:53AM -0600, Brian Mattern wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 05:52:40PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:33:06 -0600 Brian Mattern
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:53:53AM -0600, Brian Mattern wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 05:52:40PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:33:06 -0600 Brian Mattern
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Something like this is what I had in mind when I drew
> > > http://rephorm.com
On Thursday, 07 December 2006, at 11:53:53 (-0600),
Brian Mattern wrote:
> Yeah, the server its on (the same as edevelop.org) seems to be down
> again :(
I blame xcomp.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 05:52:40PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:33:06 -0600 Brian Mattern
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Something like this is what I had in mind when I drew
> > http://rephorm.com/files/old/meter-big.png a few years ago. I had
> > implemented a bit of it
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:33:06 -0600 Brian Mattern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 03:29:48AM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:32:41 +0100 "Stark, Thomas"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I eventually want to replace all these system monitoring modules
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 03:29:48AM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:32:41 +0100 "Stark, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> I eventually want to replace all these system monitoring modules with
> some common code that resembles the way that gkrellm handles graphs.
>
I wou
Am Mittwoch, den 06.12.2006, 03:29 +1000 schrieb David Seikel:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:32:41 +0100 "Stark, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > attached you will find two patches. One will fix the net module
> > (change of the calculation base, because the unit of ci->max is
> > packets not
On Wednesday, 06 December 2006, at 03:29:48 (+1000),
David Seikel wrote:
> The net module is trying to show a speedometer bar, so we need to
> know the maximum speed in order to be able to determine which
> percentage of the maximum speed, and therefore which percentage of
> the maximum sized bar
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:32:41 +0100 "Stark, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> attached you will find two patches. One will fix the net module
> (change of the calculation base, because the unit of ci->max is
> packets not bytes)
I don't think that your code, or the original code is correct.
Th
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:32:41 +0100 "Stark, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> attached you will find two patches. One will fix the net module
> (change of the calculation base, because the unit of ci->max is
> packets not bytes) and one the wlan module (emitting of the label
> activation signal)
Hi,
attached you will find two patches. One will fix the net module (change
of the calculation base, because the unit of ci->max is packets not
bytes) and one the wlan module (emitting of the label activation
signal).
By,
Thomas
--
Stark, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- e-cvs/e_modules/net/e_mo
Gah. I keep forgetting to put edevel in the To field
On 8/18/06, Sthithaprajna Garapaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taskbar is patched.
> I didnt apply the second diff because module_icon.png is deprecated.
> We probably need to remove that from cvs.
>
> On 8/18/06, Lut!n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Hi,
here are some patches to fix the e_modules eveil and taskbar so they can
pass make dist.
Also included a patch for engage and a patch for examine so they can
pass make dist as well.
Regards
Lut!n
--- engage/data/icons/Makefile.am 2006-05-10 15:03:21.0 +0200
+++ engage.patch/data/ico
commited :)
Le Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:56:42 +0200,
Lut!n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hi,
> here are three (very) small patches fixing
> e_modules/devian/data/themes/$theme/Makefile.am for make distcheck,
> for blue_eyed, clean and minimal themes
> Regards,
> Lut!n
-
Hi,here are three (very) small patches fixinge_modules/devian/data/themes/$theme/Makefile.am for make distcheck, for blue_eyed, clean and minimal themesRegards,Lut!n
--- Makefile.am 2006-05-28 00:44:52.0 +0200
+++ Makefile.am.blue_eyed 2006-07-11 20:47:53.0 +0200
@@ -1,15 +1,16 @@
Tobias wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 08:32 -0500, Jesse Luehrs wrote:
>> Original message
>>> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:35:33 +0200
>>> From: Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: Re: [E-devel] e_modules/cpu shelf patch
>
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 08:32 -0500, Jesse Luehrs wrote:
>
> Original message
> >Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:35:33 +0200
> >From: Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: [E-devel] e_modules/cpu shelf patch
> >To: edevel
> >
> &
I have been waiting a while to see if this bug was ironed out, but there
seems to be no activity lately on the mail module.
Great work!
I believe there is a bug regarding updating of the checking procedure.
I know (from reading cvs updates) that devilhorns seems to maintain this
module, and also
I would prefer to see net and cpu activity as graphs instead of bars.
the same applies to memory usage, but that's not so critical. As a
programmer, I test things a lot, including how much cpu, memory, and
network certain software uses. With only a bar, that means I have to
stare at the bar const
Original message
>Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:35:33 +0200
>From: Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [E-devel] e_modules/cpu shelf patch
>To: edevel
>
>Massimo Maiurana wrote:
>> Tobias, il 30/06/2006 02:13, scrisse:
>>> Here'
Massimo Maiurana wrote:
> Tobias, il 30/06/2006 02:13, scrisse:
>> Here's a patch for the cpu-module to make it play with the shelf.
>>
>> I've changed the theme to look like the net and mem modules
>
> personally I don't like bars to display data, especially if they
> represent values in steps of
Tobias, il 30/06/2006 02:13, scrisse:
> Here's a patch for the cpu-module to make it play with the shelf.
>
> I've changed the theme to look like the net and mem modules
personally I don't like bars to display data, especially if they
represent values in steps of ten percents.
I would like very m
Here's a patch for the cpu-module to make it play with the shelf.
I've changed the theme to look like the net and mem modules, the pngs
showing the meters can be downloaded here:
http://347.shit.la/pics.tar.gz
(renamed images from from net-module).
/Regards
Tobias Glenstrup
--- Makefile.am.ori
Hello
I think there's a bug in the net-module, if I set the polltime to 1 it
displays sane values, but increasing the polltime increases the Rx and
Tx values.
Dividing the in/out values with the polltime seems to be one solution.
/Regards
Tobias Glenstrup
--- e_mod_main.c.orig 2006-06-21 05:35:4
Just so everyone else not on IRC late in the (american) evening knows:
The 3rd party e17 modules that were pulled out of e17/apps/e_modules a few
weeks ago have been placed back in cvs. This time, however, they are in their
own CVS module (e_modules). This allows developer access from the normal
"Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que :
> I've also attached my latest diff for the monitor module. :-)
this one still segfaults on my amd64. the last version to work is the
one without the configuration file save.
will try to get you a backtrace. thx
--
Mathieu
-
Here is a diff that updates e_modules to use timestamps.
I've also attached my latest diff for the monitor module. :-)
--
Ed Presutti (ekrunch on freenode)
--
understand, v.:
To reach a point, in your investigation of some subject, at which
you cease to examine what is really pr
29 matches
Mail list logo
