I think this looks very reasonable. Were you able to verify with the
XCB devs that we can poll on the cookies like this?
On Dec 31, 2007 10:25 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
Another possibility (raster's idea) for
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
I think this looks very reasonable. Were you able to verify with the
XCB devs that we can poll on the cookies like this?
They didn't answer me yet. Maybe they are on holydays :)
Vincent
On Dec 31, 2007 10:25 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
Another possibility (raster's idea) for
ecore_x_drawable_geometry_get_async is to sent an event
ECORE_X_REPLY_GEOMETRY_GET just when the xcb_get_geometry_reply call has
returned. The event would contain (actually, would be) the structure
above.
On Jul 14, 2007 11:27 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Vincent Torri wrote:
Proposal #2:
If XCB is found:
* If a request does not need a reply, the function is just a translation
of the Xlib code. Nothing much to say.
Agreed so far.
* If a
Hey
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Vincent Torri wrote:
Here is a suggestion of a new ecore_xcb api, according to all the remarks I
have noted.
Currently:
* ecore_x_* functions use Xlib code if XCB is not found, otherwise use XCB
code. In the latter case, one has to use 2 other functions
