On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:07:21 +0200 "Ag. Systems Administrator - Danny"
said:
> ok, got you.
> i was thought that min and max values should behave same as offset.
> (but i still think, that -1 is more suitable, than there ;))
well as it suggested.. you could use 2147483647 :) it is the max va
ok, got you.
i was thought that min and max values should behave same as offset.
(but i still think, that -1 is more suitable, than there ;))
Thank you,
Daniel
2011/3/1 michael bouchaud
> no it's relative to editje, he writes a wrong edc file with error. And I
> think for this time the m
no it's relative to editje, he writes a wrong edc file with error. And I
think for this time the message sent by edje_cc is clear -1. out of
range of 0.000 to 2147483647.000 inclusive.
If you really want use a max value. take a big value where it has no chance
to reach it, like max: 9 41;
Hi,
any reason that edje_cc fails to compile edj with this message:
ERR<26599>:edje_cc edje_cc_parse.c:1044 parse_float_range() edje_cc: Error.
:130 float -1.000 out of range of 0.000 to 2147483647.000 inclusive
for these lines of edc file:
part { name: "browbar";
type: IMAG
