Re: [E-devel] on sorted inserts in elm_gen*

2011-12-30 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:12:35 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:43:10 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said: why is

[E-devel] on sorted inserts in elm_gen*

2011-12-29 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
why is there both a direct_sorted_insert() and a sorted_insert() when they both do the exact same thing? -- Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to

Re: [E-devel] on sorted inserts in elm_gen*

2011-12-29 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:43:10 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said: why is there both a direct_sorted_insert() and a sorted_insert() when they both do the exact same thing? they dont do the same thing. not quite. though i think its silly to have both.

Re: [E-devel] on sorted inserts in elm_gen*

2011-12-29 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:12:35 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:43:10 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said: why is there both a direct_sorted_insert() and a sorted_insert() when they both do the exact same