On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:12:35 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:43:10 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
why is
why is there both a direct_sorted_insert() and a sorted_insert() when they both
do the exact same thing?
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:43:10 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
why is there both a direct_sorted_insert() and a sorted_insert() when they
both do the exact same thing?
they dont do the same thing. not quite. though i think its silly to have both.
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:12:35 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:43:10 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
why is there both a direct_sorted_insert() and a sorted_insert() when they
both do the exact same