On Sunday, 23 October 2005, at 08:48:30 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
> please, run
> ./configure --disable-ecore-con
> and tell me if ecore_con is disable
First off, your example was "job," not "con." The code for job was
correct. The code for con was not. However, your "fix" would've
broken
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 October 2005, at 01:37:55 (+0200),
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> > well, the way it is currently done, it does not work
>
> Consult the autoconf info pages with respect to AC_ARG_ENABLE.
please, run
./configure --disable-ecore-con
and te
On Sunday, 23 October 2005, at 01:37:55 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
> well, the way it is currently done, it does not work
Consult the autoconf info pages with respect to AC_ARG_ENABLE.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http:/
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 October 2005, at 01:30:18 (+0200),
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> >
> > hey,
> >
> > for all the AC_ARG_ENABLE with a --disable option, i think that the test
> > are not good. The "yes" answer and the "no" answer are swapped.
> > for examp
On Sunday, 23 October 2005, at 01:30:18 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> hey,
>
> for all the AC_ARG_ENABLE with a --disable option, i think that the test
> are not good. The "yes" answer and the "no" answer are swapped.
> for example
>
>
> AC_ARG_ENABLE(ecore-job,
> [ --disable-ecore-job
hey,
for all the AC_ARG_ENABLE with a --disable option, i think that the test
are not good. The "yes" answer and the "no" answer are swapped.
for example
AC_ARG_ENABLE(ecore-job,
[ --disable-ecore-job disable the ecore_job module],
[
if test x"$enableval" = x"yes" ; then
