On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:05:11 +0100
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > 1) item_position_get() <-- returns position # of item
> > this could probably be implemented by updating the position index as
> > items are added/removed, though that would
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> 1) item_position_get() <-- returns position # of item
> this could probably be implemented by updating the position index as
> items are added/removed, though that would be a slowdown in large lists.
> perhaps giving indexes to the ite
1) item_position_get() <-- returns position # of item
this could probably be implemented by updating the position index as
items are added/removed, though that would be a slowdown in large lists.
perhaps giving indexes to the item blocks and keeping position relative to
those would be better?
2) r
