Hi, This is Hermet.
Here are simple patches for invalid pointers
Please review then apply them.
Danke!
Index: src/lib/eet_lib.c
===
--- src/lib/eet_lib.c (revision 56208)
+++ src/lib/eet_lib.c (working copy)
@@ -1725,11 +17
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] some bug fix patches
>
> Right.
> It looks wrong to me too.
> Spank Hermet!
>
> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
> > Hi Hermet
> >
>
Hi Hermet
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, ChunEon Park wrote:
> Hi, This is Hermet.
>
> Here are simple patches for invalid pointers
>
> Please review then apply them.
Patches 001_eet.patch.txt and 002_evas.patch.txt were applied.
Patch 001_evas.patch.txt does not look right. Besides the trai
Right.
It looks wrong to me too.
Spank Hermet!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> Hi Hermet
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, ChunEon Park
> wrote:
>> Hi, This is Hermet.
>>
>> Here are simple patches for invalid pointers
>>
>> Please review
On 01/21/2011 10:04 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Patch 001_evas.patch.txt does not look right. Besides the trailing
> whitespaces, it doesn't make sense. Maybe you forgot to save your
> changes before sending?
-free(g);
-free(g->keyname);
I think the essence of the patch
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:23 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
> - free(g);
> - free(g->keyname);
>
> I think the essence of the patch is that the above two lines are in the wrong
> order.
>
> It would be clearer if whitespace changes were not mixed with fixes.
Actually, I didn't e
From: Daniel Juyung Seo [mailto:seojuyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:41 AM
To: Lucas De Marchi
Cc: ChunEon Park; enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E-devel] some bug fix patches
Right.
It looks wrong to me too.
Spank Hermet!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Fri, J
