It currently lacks support for structs which I was planning on adding but
no longer have the time.
There are a few bugs in there that I have patches for but have been unable
to test due to lack of linux box at this time - should be fixed shortly.
Use it and see - feedback is always useful :)
Andy
It currently lacks support for structs which I was planning on adding but
no longer have the time.
There are a few bugs in there that I have patches for but have been unable
to test due to lack of linux box at this time - should be fixed shortly.
Use it and see - feedback is always useful :)
Andy
imho, it should stay, as it provides a nice abstraction layer for
storing configuration ( with the possibility of using a unified tool to
edit the binary config files later ). I am personally using it for the
edje-viewer, and it was dead easy to implement.
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 23:28 +0100, Vinc
Hey,
I'm writing a small app, and i would like to store its configuration. So I
thought about ecore_config.
But, Peter told me that it's rarely used. Also, for example, ewl has it's
own config stuff, like e17. It seems that we are reinventing the wheel
very often :/
So my question is: is eco
