On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 21:36:27 -0500 Jesse Charbneau
> said:
>> On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> for some reason your reply has been lost in my mailbox. damn! so i'll reply to
> the reply... :)
>
[...]
>> >>> =
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> On Monday 08 November 2010 19:02:27 Ian Caldwell wrote:
>> one additional thing that needs some major love is exchange. It needs to be
>> rewritten and worked into the main site.. it looks like shit and the
>> maintainer left the project. Also i
Sorry Gustavo I know this is offtopic, I'll try to be brief.
On Martes 09 Noviembre 2010 01:10:51 Ian Caldwell escribió:
> here's what we in all honesty Have to do. We need to ignore all the current
> date, better yet move to e.org/old and we need to recreate a completely
> BRAND new website, don'
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:12:27 -0800 Ian Caldwell said:
> our site does not need reshuffling that's what we seem to do all the time,
> we "reshuffle" the site and it turns out worse and worse and worse. It needs
> to be demolished and recreated from the ground up.
we've done that enough with no pos
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:10:51 -0800 Ian Caldwell said:
create the site first... THEN we'll consider if it can be used or not. we are
NOt tearing down e.org right when we are releasing EFL. hell no. not happening.
it stays and gets content and reshuffling. if in parallel you want to create a
next-ge
our site does not need reshuffling that's what we seem to do all the time,
we "reshuffle" the site and it turns out worse and worse and worse. It needs
to be demolished and recreated from the ground up.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 21:36:27 -0500 Jes
here's what we in all honesty Have to do. We need to ignore all the current
date, better yet move to e.org/old and we need to recreate a completely
BRAND new website, don't use any existing contest, just adapt and design
with a whole new approach in mind. Also there needs to be a team of
approximat
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 21:36:27 -0500 Jesse Charbneau said:
website doesnt need any amazing web skills. it just needs content shuffling.
there's. so you don't really need those. the site is in svn - the rest is on
the wiki (trac). again - wiki markup. :) if you can figure out why trac does
the crazy
Hello,
I spend most of my days in web land supporting/debugging java, php, perl, sh
(mainly tomcat, apache, mysql, etc). I’m wrapping up a side project, and with
the holiday season coming up I’m sure I could spend some cycles helping out
(least I could do considering the kickin’ libs and supp
Well, I'll reply this mail with quite a bit of sadness... likely we'll
go nowhere from what you wrote. Maybe others can also reply with their
feelings.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:32:54 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>
i promised some images/icons/logos/etc will talk to raster as soon as you
guys figure out what you want/need and I have some time.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 06:51:38 +1000 David Seikel said:
>
> > All well and good, but can someone with a clue
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 06:51:38 +1000 David Seikel said:
> All well and good, but can someone with a clue fix up TRAC? Personally
> I have no clue about TRAC. If my recent experience is any guide, no
> one can just create an account and start using it, all they get is
> error messages, no ability t
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:32:54 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> Hi all,
>
> Raster is trying to solve our website problems by doing some work, but
> looking at it from an outsider point of view (I've asked some) we're
> not getting much better. I'm not even referring to look and feel,
> graph
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:02:27 -0800 Ian Caldwell said:
while i agree - this is another topic imho entirely :)
> one additional thing that needs some major love is exchange. It needs to be
> rewritten and worked into the main site.. it looks like shit and the
> maintainer left the project. Also it
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
wrote:
> On Monday 08 November 2010 19:02:27 Ian Caldwell wrote:
>> one additional thing that needs some major love is exchange. It needs to be
>> rewritten and worked into the main site.. it looks like shit and the
>> maintainer left the proje
On Monday 08 November 2010 19:02:27 Ian Caldwell wrote:
> one additional thing that needs some major love is exchange. It needs to be
> rewritten and worked into the main site.. it looks like shit and the
> maintainer left the project. Also it was built off of some random
> framework. The new solut
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:51 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> All well and good, but can someone with a clue fix up TRAC? Personally
> I have no clue about TRAC. If my recent experience is any guide, no
> one can just create an account and start using it, all they get is
> error messages, no ability to
one additional thing that needs some major love is exchange. It needs to be
rewritten and worked into the main site.. it looks like shit and the
maintainer left the project. Also it was built off of some random framework.
The new solution should not be framework based because that just makes
things
All well and good, but can someone with a clue fix up TRAC? Personally
I have no clue about TRAC. If my recent experience is any guide, no
one can just create an account and start using it, all they get is
error messages, no ability to comment on or create stuff. That's one
BIG turn off right th
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:32:54 -0200
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Raster is trying to solve our website problems by doing some work, but
> looking at it from an outsider point of view (I've asked some) we're
> not getting much better. I'm not even referring to look and feel,
> grap
Hi all,
Raster is trying to solve our website problems by doing some work, but
looking at it from an outsider point of view (I've asked some) we're
not getting much better. I'm not even referring to look and feel,
graphics or similar inconsistencies, but contents. I'd like to
highlight the problem
21 matches
Mail list logo
