Hi,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Friday, December 21, 2012, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Ulisses Furquim
>> >
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> > >
>> wrote:
>> >>
On Friday, December 21, 2012, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Ulisses Furquim
> >
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> > >
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:55:25 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> >> > said:
> >>
> >>>
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:55:25 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> said:
>>
>>> On Friday, December 21, 2012, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Fri
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:55:25 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Friday, December 21, 2012, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> >
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:55:25 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Friday, December 21, 2012, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, December 21, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri
On Friday, December 21, 2012, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, December 21, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:08:09 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > > said:
> > >
> > > > Does
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
>
> On Friday, December 21, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:08:09 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > said:
> >
> > > Does it solve the problem?
> > >
> > > It's weird because those images should be r
On Friday, December 21, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:08:09 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
>
> > Does it solve the problem?
> >
> > It's weird because those images should be referenced and pixels kept
> until
> > rendered. Do you know if someone else is releasing
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:08:09 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> Does it solve the problem?
>
> It's weird because those images should be referenced and pixels kept until
> rendered. Do you know if someone else is releasing the pixels forcefully
> before that?
>
> Also, couldn't you sync onl
Does it solve the problem?
It's weird because those images should be referenced and pixels kept until
rendered. Do you know if someone else is releasing the pixels forcefully
before that?
Also, couldn't you sync only once the canvas at the beginning of the
function? Or there are multiple canvases
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 03:25:20 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN"
wrote:
> Log:
> remove shadow option - this is handled by styles anyway, and make a
> basic vs advanced cfg dialog for every one except me that is unable
> to cope with settings widgets that are entirely devoid of
> meaningful usage info. :
raster, have u considered eina_tiler? it's basically what evas uses.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> lots of fixes. looking solid now. bugs gone. argb windows handled. proper
> update queue with tile updates etc.
>
>
> Author: raster
> Date: 2010
12 matches
Mail list logo
