On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:31:56 -0700 Blake Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Excellent document!
>
> I know a professional editor that I'm going to have look it over.
> Here's one thing that's jumped out at me so far:
>
> The stack diagram on this[1] page is wrong, I understand that it's
This is even more misleading imo. Embryo relies in no way on ecore,
esmart OR epeg/epsilon (in fact it has no deps). Epeg doesn't rely on
evas.
Its really difficult (if not impossible) to accurately portray the EFL
as a block diagram.
--
rephorm
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 03:31:56PM -0700, Blake Bar
Excellent document!
I know a professional editor that I'm going to have look it over.
Here's one thing that's jumped out at me so far:
The stack diagram on this[1] page is wrong, I understand that it's
explained later as being fundamentally flawed, but even still, it's
quite misleading. I
Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 09:51 +0300 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> The first full draft of the EFL documentation
> is finished. Thanks to Matthew R. Dempsky for
> fixing several spelling mistakes (although I am
> sure there are more).
Wow - good job! I enjoyed reading this - you have a compreh
You're welcome to host the documentation on edevelop.org. Let me
know of any facilities I can provide. I'm happy to do so.
-Blake
On Jun 27, 2006, at 11:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The first full draft of the EFL documentation
> is finished. Thanks to Matthew R. Dempsky for
> fixing