Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-29 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 18:36:31 +0100 Michal Suchanek said: > On 29 December 2015 at 01:11, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:35:11 +0100 Michal Suchanek > > said: > > > >> On 27 December 2015 at 23:27, Carsten Haitzler > >> wrote: > >> > On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:59:33 +0100 Stanis

Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-29 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 29 December 2015 at 01:11, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:35:11 +0100 Michal Suchanek said: > >> On 27 December 2015 at 23:27, Carsten Haitzler wrote: >> > On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:59:33 +0100 Stanislav Baiduzhyi >> > said: >> > >> >> I've noticed that fonts in EFL-based apps

Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-28 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 08:16:55 +0100 Stanislav Baiduzhyi said: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > so thats why we have a scale factor setting in e (and elm) and this just > > sizes stuff up - not JUST fonts, but many many many things. it's the "make > > it bigger > >

Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-28 Thread Stanislav Baiduzhyi
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > so thats why we have a scale factor setting in e (and elm) and this just sizes > stuff up - not JUST fonts, but many many many things. it's the "make it bigger > - i can't see that" option which is what people ACTUALLY want. > > for evas -

Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-28 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:39:16 +0100 Stanislav Baiduzhyi said: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > 100% intended. there is no way we are doing that insanely bad sub-pixel rgb > > stuff n efl. an explicit decision to not support it. why? > > That makes some sense. Pit

Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-28 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:35:11 +0100 Michal Suchanek said: > On 27 December 2015 at 23:27, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:59:33 +0100 Stanislav Baiduzhyi > > said: > > > >> I've noticed that fonts in EFL-based apps are not as good as in Qt > >> apps, and digging into source it

Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-28 Thread Stanislav Baiduzhyi
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> That makes some sense. Pity, on still very popular 96 DPI monitor >> readability of subpixeled font is one step higher. > Popular in the sense you can easily pull a working one from the trash? In a sense that around 60% of all monitors in

Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-28 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 27 December 2015 at 23:27, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:59:33 +0100 Stanislav Baiduzhyi > said: > >> I've noticed that fonts in EFL-based apps are not as good as in Qt >> apps, and digging into source it looks like LCD rendering is not >> supported, render mode is hardcoded

Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-28 Thread Stanislav Baiduzhyi
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > 100% intended. there is no way we are doing that insanely bad sub-pixel rgb > stuff n efl. an explicit decision to not support it. why? That makes some sense. Pity, on still very popular 96 DPI monitor readability of subpixeled font is o

Re: [E-devel] EFL and subpixel antialiasing

2015-12-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:59:33 +0100 Stanislav Baiduzhyi said: > I've noticed that fonts in EFL-based apps are not as good as in Qt > apps, and digging into source it looks like LCD rendering is not > supported, render mode is hardcoded to FT_RENDER_MODE_NORMAL. Is that > intentional or just not ye