Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:27:34 +0400 sda said: > please look above and let's find some sane solution. API/ABI change > should in theory change SONAME (i.e. libfoo.so.0.1 -> libfoo.so.0.2) > but ... we're in a real world and we're working with svn. why not to use > changes of Version along with the

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-17 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:50 AM, sda wrote: > as we recently discussed on IRC the results of the patch will lead th the > changing of a SONAME. illustration is below. > Please note that this was also explained in my initial mail. > current data: > >> objdump -x /usr/lib/libeina.so.0.0.1 | grep -

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:25 PM, sda wrote: >> hi, >> >> just FYI - general rules for rpm packaging: >> http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html >> brief summary of packaging conventions which confirms to the LSB could >> be revie

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:25 PM, sda wrote: > hi, > > just FYI - general rules for rpm packaging: > http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html > brief summary of packaging conventions which confirms to the LSB could > be reviewed below (distro-specific!): > http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > in that case, is it good to specify both -release and -version-info in > _LDFLAGS ? > I think it's mostly a matter of taste. Keeping both doesn't hurt much IMHO, and all you'll have to do when there's a real release is remove the '-releas

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote: >> >>> Patch attached. As usual, comments are welcome >> >> in ecore, is it really necessary to have a release-info for each module ? >> > > I t

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > >> Patch attached. As usual, comments are welcome > > in ecore, is it really necessary to have a release-info for each module ? > I think it's better, unless you want to force a SONAME change

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-15 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > Patch attached. As usual, comments are welcome in ecore, is it really necessary to have a release-info for each module ? Vincent > > Regards, > Albin > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Carsten Haitzler > Date: Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at