On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:54:13 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >
> >> ok, evas_free is there, all ecore is del, maybe rename free->del in
> >> evas and have all destructors/
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> ok, evas_free is there, all ecore is del, maybe rename free->del in
>> evas and have all destructors/deleters to be _del? I will not say the
>> same for _add/_new since they are diff
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> ok, evas_free is there, all ecore is del, maybe rename free->del in
> evas and have all destructors/deleters to be _del? I will not say the
> same for _add/_new since they are different things/concepts, although
> I'd not bother if rename _ad
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I think that, before the release, we should verify that the api is consistent.
>
> I think that, at least, we must verify that:
>
> 1) if a function has a _add sufix, the invert function must have the _del
> sufix
>
> 2) if a funct
Vincent Torri schrieb:
> Hey,
>
> I think that, before the release, we should verify that the api is consistent.
>
> I think that, at least, we must verify that:
>
> 1) if a function has a _add sufix, the invert function must have the _del
> sufix
>
> 2) if a function has a _new sufix, the invert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:01:08 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I think that, before the release, we should verify that the api is consistent.
>
> I think that, at least, we must verify that:
>
> 1) if a function has a _add sufix, the
