Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-06 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 23:41:16 -0500 "Laurence J. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > The xpm buffer overflow reported for imlib also appears to affect > > imlib2. You can read the details at: http://bugs.debian.org/285138 > > (a bit slow thanks

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-03 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 05:49:06 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 23:41:16 -0500 "Laurence J. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > The xpm buffer overflow repor

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-03 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 00:05:48 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Tuesday, 04 January 2005, at 13:05:48 (+0900), > Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > can someone get me a sample tif that doesn't work? i can display > > tif's here that i create... i'll get onto that

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-03 Thread Michael Jennings
On Tuesday, 04 January 2005, at 13:05:48 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: > can someone get me a sample tif that doesn't work? i can display > tif's here that i create... i'll get onto that. other than that - > any other issues? (i see you just updated .spec files... good good > :)) According to

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-03 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 22:39:50 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Tuesday, 04 January 2005, at 12:34:59 (+0900), > Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > (a bit slow thanks to xmas and new years...) but.. fixed in cvs. i > > am tempted to release imlib2 1.2.0 - does a

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-03 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 22:41:07 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Monday 03 January 2005 10:34 pm, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > (a bit slow thanks to xmas and new years...) but.. fixed in cvs. i am > > tempted to release imlib2 1.2.0 - does anyone have any objections,

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 03 January 2005 10:34 pm, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > (a bit slow thanks to xmas and new years...) but.. fixed in cvs. i am > tempted to release imlib2 1.2.0 - does anyone have any objections, patches > etc. etc. etc. ? i could roll another cvs snapshot of imlib2 and releas

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-03 Thread Michael Jennings
On Tuesday, 04 January 2005, at 12:34:59 (+0900), Carsten Haitzler wrote: > (a bit slow thanks to xmas and new years...) but.. fixed in cvs. i > am tempted to release imlib2 1.2.0 - does anyone have any > objections, patches etc. etc. etc. ? What about the all-black TIFF issue? Lemme at least

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-03 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 23:41:16 -0500 "Laurence J. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > The xpm buffer overflow reported for imlib also appears to affect > imlib2. You can read the details at: http://bugs.debian.org/285138 (a bit slow thanks to xmas and new years...) but.. fixed i