Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel][OT]

2004-06-28 Thread Morten Nilsen
Bradley Reed wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:20:38 -0400 > Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> There's nothing like that in it. Basically my beef is that Slackware >> no longer has a niche. LFS and Gentoo are the hands-on distros, and >> RedHat and Debian are the package-based di

Re: [e-users] E17 apps/libs rpms repository. Yum/Apt powered!

2004-06-28 Thread Didier Casse
On 28/06/04, at 23:01 +0200, Danilo Alfaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Hi All, > > I'm finally done with some scripts that can pull E17 libs/apps from > >cvs, compile them, build specs, make rpms out and finally place > >them in an apt/yum repository. > > >

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel][OT]

2004-06-28 Thread Bradley Reed
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:20:38 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's nothing like that in it. Basically my beef is that Slackware > no longer has a niche. LFS and Gentoo are the hands-on distros, and > RedHat and Debian are the package-based distros. IMHO, Slackware was > c

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 28 June 2004, at 15:47:15 (-0400), Bradley Reed wrote: > I'd like to persuade Patrick V. to get enlightenment and Eterm back > in Slackware. Now that libast doesn't seem to conflict with the > 'other libast used by Korn Shell" and now that the size of the > enlightenment base package is

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Bradley Reed
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:36:11 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday, 28 June 2004, at 14:28:39 (-0400), > Bradley Reed wrote: > > > I use Eterm in Slackware which dropped enlightenment and Eterm long > > ago. > > Well, Slackware's a whole different ballgame. I'll spare yo

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 28 June 2004, at 14:28:39 (-0400), Bradley Reed wrote: > I use Eterm in Slackware which dropped enlightenment and Eterm long ago. Well, Slackware's a whole different ballgame. I'll spare you my Slackware rant. :-) > I can see SUSE's point. More and more distros are supporting UTF-8 >

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Bradley Reed
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:05:52 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday, 28 June 2004, at 18:01:01 (+0100), > Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > > Sorry, but I can see their point. No UTF-8, no tabs. > > Incorrect. First off, aterm and wterm don't have tabs either. > Secondly, Eterm

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Bradley Reed
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:54:18 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone here who uses Eterm on SuSE might want to know about this. If > you think their reasoning sucks as much as I do, e-mail them and let > them know. > > > - Forwarded message from Heiko Rommel <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [e-users] Perhaps another bug/user error?

2004-06-28 Thread Kim Woelders
Viktor Kojouharov wrote: Îðèãèíàëíî ïèñìî Îò: Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Îòíîñíî: Re: [e-users] Perhaps another bug/user error? Äî: enlightenment maillist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Èçïðàòåíî íà: Ïîíåäåëíèê, 2004, Þíè 28 03:08:58 EEST -- Viktor Ko

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 18:05, Michael Jennings wrote: > Incorrect. First off, aterm and wterm don't have tabs either. > Secondly, Eterm DOES HAVE TABS. Well, that shows how long it's been since I tried it. But I switched to gnome-terminal when ETerm (a) didn't have tabs, and (b) was enough of a p

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 28 June 2004, at 18:01:01 (+0100), Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > Sorry, but I can see their point. No UTF-8, no tabs. Incorrect. First off, aterm and wterm don't have tabs either. Secondly, Eterm DOES HAVE TABS. As for UTF-8, I don't own or run a single system where I haven't forceably ch

Re: [e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Mark R. Bowyer
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 17:54, Michael Jennings wrote: > Anyone here who uses Eterm on SuSE might want to know about this. If > you think their reasoning sucks as much as I do, e-mail them and let > them know. Sorry, but I can see their point. No UTF-8, no tabs. Just unable to compete with the cu

[e-users] SuSE Drops Eterm [Fwd from Heiko Rommel]

2004-06-28 Thread Michael Jennings
Anyone here who uses Eterm on SuSE might want to know about this. If you think their reasoning sucks as much as I do, e-mail them and let them know. Michael - Forwarded message from Heiko Rommel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:28:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Heiko Rommel <[EMAI

Re: [e-users] E17 apps/libs rpms repository. Yum/Apt powered!

2004-06-28 Thread Danilo Alfaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I'm finally done with some scripts that can pull E17 libs/apps from cvs, compile them, build specs, make rpms out and finally place them in an apt/yum repository. THANKS A LOT...! So in principle, I can setup a cron job and make it do this daily. But for

Re: [e-users] (no subject)

2004-06-28 Thread Matias Grana
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Kim Woelders wrote: > It looks like you want to compile using Imlib1 (--without-imlib2), or > maybe this is because autogen.sh hasn't been run. > The Imlib1 build has been broken for some time but was fixed yesterday. > However, I strongly suggest that you use Imlib2, as the I

Re: [e-users] (no subject)

2004-06-28 Thread Kim Woelders
Matias Grana wrote: On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Kim Woelders wrote: Viktor Kojouharov wrote: It's not the brand new code (although it's post pre4 or whatever the latest pre is), since the new cvs doesn't build, but: AFAIK there are no problems with building current CVS. It does appear that Alias's Maya,

[e-users] (no subject)

2004-06-28 Thread Matias Grana
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Kim Woelders wrote: > Viktor Kojouharov wrote: > > It's not the brand new code (although it's post pre4 or whatever the > > latest pre is), since the new cvs doesn't build, but: > > > AFAIK there are no problems with building current CVS. > > > It does appear that Alias's Ma

[e-users] E17 apps/libs rpms repository. Yum/Apt powered!

2004-06-28 Thread Didier Casse
Hi All, I'm finally done with some scripts that can pull E17 libs/apps from cvs, compile them, build specs, make rpms out and finally place them in an apt/yum repository. So in principle, I can setup a cron job and make it do this daily. But for now, it would be like once in a week thing fo

Re: Re: [e-users] Perhaps another bug/user error?

2004-06-28 Thread Viktor Kojouharov
> Оригинално писмо >От: Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Относно: Re: [e-users] Perhaps another bug/user error? >До: enlightenment maillist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Изпратено на: Понеделник, 2004, Юни 28 03:08:58 EEST >-- > >Viktor Kojouharov w