Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread samael
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 05:27:51PM +0100, Morten Nilsen wrote: > Morten Nilsen wrote: > > Kim Woelders wrote: > >> In case there still are a few out there using e16 :) > > > > it seems "window skip list" isn't used by the alt-tab list to exclude > > windows... toggling window skip list on an Eterm

Re: [e-users] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
phriedrich wrote: On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:21:27 +0100 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] However, I'm not sure it should be available as a general window option. Why not? But would be enough to have it available from eesh. It's important for having (pseudo-)transparent, borderless window

Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
Morten Nilsen wrote: I also seem to be having issues with stability... closed Gaim and was dropped to xdm without warning. coming back with more details if I can hunt them down. I have seen that too a couple of times. I have a suspicion it is related to the systray, but I haven't figured out the ex

Re: [e-users] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread phriedrich
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:21:27 +0100 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > However, I'm not sure it should be available as a general > window option. Why not? But would be enough to have it available from eesh. It's important for having (pseudo-)transparent, borderless windows directly on

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:21:31 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > Kim Woelders wrote: > > Morten Nilsen wrote: > >> just discovered another bug here... if I set a window to stacking > >on> top, it will obscure enlightenments' window menu! > >> > > Fixed in CVS. > > Still same behaviour... sf.net need

Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
Morten Nilsen wrote: it seems "window skip list" isn't used by the alt-tab list to exclude windows... toggling window skip list on an Eterm doesn't affect the list of windows when hitting alt-tab... Should now be fixed in CVS. Please note that if you are using anonymous CVS it will probably take a

Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Morten Nilsen wrote: > Kim Woelders wrote: >> In case there still are a few out there using e16 :) > > it seems "window skip list" isn't used by the alt-tab list to exclude > windows... toggling window skip list on an Eterm doesn't affect the list > of windows when hitting alt-tab... > I also se

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Kim Woelders wrote: > Morten Nilsen wrote: >> >> however, the "menus are being generated... please wait" dialogue never >> goes away... >> > My guess is that you have a non- en_XX locale and do not have iconv. > If so, e_gen_menu will run for a *very* long time. > Should be fixed in CVS now. > If

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Kim Woelders wrote: > Morten Nilsen wrote: >> just discovered another bug here... if I set a window to stacking on >> top, it will obscure enlightenments' window menu! >> > Fixed in CVS. Still same behaviour... >> also, is it possible for new windows to appear *centered* on screen? >> > Not atm

Re: [e-users] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
phriedrich wrote: Only two small things still: - I have a transparent, borderless Iconbox, with unsharp shadow there's allways a shadow as big as the box is, with hard shadows there's none what looks much better in this case. Maybe there should be an option to have a certain window without shadows

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
Morten Nilsen wrote: just discovered another bug here... if I set a window to stacking on top, it will obscure enlightenments' window menu! Fixed in CVS. also, is it possible for new windows to appear *centered* on screen? Not atm. It could fairly easily be implemented as an option. /Kim --

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
Morten Nilsen wrote: however, the "menus are being generated... please wait" dialogue never goes away... My guess is that you have a non- en_XX locale and do not have iconv. If so, e_gen_menu will run for a *very* long time. Should be fixed in CVS now. If this is not the problem, please try running

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Andreas Volz wrote: > You need this tools only for building from CVS. In the package Version > you don't need xmlto. For intltool I'm not sure. But 0.0.1 doesn't work > for current CVS menu structure. So you're forced to wait for a release > if you didn't like to install this tools. But I plan to r

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:10:27 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > Andreas Volz wrote: > > Am Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:34:12 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > >> e16menuedit was compiled from current cvs > > > > Try the current e16menuedit2 CVS from e16/tools/e16menuedit2. The > > other is not working for E > 0

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Andreas Volz wrote: > Am Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:34:12 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: >> e16menuedit was compiled from current cvs > > Try the current e16menuedit2 CVS from e16/tools/e16menuedit2. The other > is not working for E > 0.16.8. right. hmm, I don't particularily feel like packaging "xmlto"

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:34:12 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > Morten Nilsen wrote: > > right, fired it up, and... no application menu (no reaction to > > mouse1) renamed old .enlightenment to .e16, still no application > > menu... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~$ e16menuedit > hmm. looks like you have some

Re: [e-users] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread phriedrich
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:38:29 +0100 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try "eesh set compmgr.mode 1". Many thanks, that worked. Only two small things still: - I have a transparent, borderless Iconbox, with unsharp shadow there's allways a shadow as big as the box is, with hard shadows the

[e-users] Re: [E-devel] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Kim Woelders wrote: > In case there still are a few out there using e16 :) it seems "window skip list" isn't used by the alt-tab list to exclude windows... toggling window skip list on an Eterm doesn't affect the list of windows when hitting alt-tab... -- Morten ---

[e-users] Re: [E-devel] Eterm 0.9.3 input...

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Morten Nilsen wrote: > Just upgraded to 0.9.3 the other day, and now, pressing win-e-' no > longer produces é in eterm (only e') other keys also have problems > (like "^") > > my .Xmodmap has this rule; > keycode 115 = Multi_key > > Eterm was built with these options; > --with-backspace=bs --with

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Morten Nilsen wrote: > and there we are... thank you for pointing out (the obvious) just discovered another bug here... if I set a window to stacking on top, it will obscure enlightenments' window menu! also, is it possible for new windows to appear *centered* on screen? Cheers, -- Morten ---

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Morten Nilsen wrote: > Kim Woelders wrote: >> It should have been automatically generated. Did you do make install? > > no menus were generated when I first started e16, in fact, the > "regenerating menus" dialog just hung on the screen until i clicked "ok" > >> You may also want to read README.M

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Kim Woelders wrote: > It should have been automatically generated. Did you do make install? no menus were generated when I first started e16, in fact, the "regenerating menus" dialog just hung on the screen until i clicked "ok" > You may also want to read README.Migrate and INSTALL :) ofcourse I

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Morten Nilsen wrote: > right, fired it up, and... no application menu (no reaction to mouse1) > renamed old .enlightenment to .e16, still no application menu... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~$ e16menuedit hmm. looks like you have some "issues" as you don't have a /home/users/mortenn/.enlightenment/file.menu

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
It should have been automatically generated. Did you do make install? You may also want to read README.Migrate and INSTALL :) /Kim Morten Nilsen wrote: right, fired it up, and... no application menu (no reaction to mouse1) renamed old .enlightenment to .e16, still no application menu... how do I ge

Re: [e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Peter Hyman
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 14:18 +0100, Morten Nilsen wrote: > right, fired it up, and... no application menu (no reaction to mouse1) > renamed old .enlightenment to .e16, still no application menu... > > how do I get my menu back? > ~/.enlightenment is the 0.16.7 config area ~/.e16 is the new. also

[e-users] e16.8 menu?

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
right, fired it up, and... no application menu (no reaction to mouse1) renamed old .enlightenment to .e16, still no application menu... how do I get my menu back? -- Morten --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get

Re: [e-users] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
phriedrich wrote: Hi, I can't enable the internal composite manager in todays CVS, it just does nothing. Even when trying that from eesh with "cm start" it isn't working and "cm" shows always on="0". I started xcompmgr to see if it's working at least, and thats ok (but have some faults preventing m

Re: [e-users] e16.8 in CVS

2005-01-02 Thread phriedrich
Hi, I can't enable the internal composite manager in todays CVS, it just does nothing. Even when trying that from eesh with "cm start" it isn't working and "cm" shows always on="0". I started xcompmgr to see if it's working at least, and thats ok (but have some faults preventing me to use it with

Re: [e-users] e16 cvs build fails...

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Kim Woelders wrote: > Hmm. For some reason configure doesn't find it and doesn't set > HAVE_X11_SM_SMLIB_H in config.h. > Maybe there is some info in the configure log. > configure:5066: checking X11/SM/SMlib.h usability configure:5078: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 conftest.c:59:26: X11/SM/SMlib

Re: [e-users] e16 cvs build fails...

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
Hmm. For some reason configure doesn't find it and doesn't set HAVE_X11_SM_SMLIB_H in config.h. Maybe there is some info in the configure log. /Kim Morten Nilsen wrote: Kim Woelders wrote: Compilation was broken when HAVE_X11_SM_SMLIB_H was not set (fixed). It looks like you don't have . curious,

Re: [e-users] e16 cvs build fails...

2005-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Kim Woelders wrote: > Compilation was broken when HAVE_X11_SM_SMLIB_H was not set (fixed). > It looks like you don't have . curious, as I do have the header; -r--r--r-- 1 root root 11324 2004-11-16 10:06 /usr/X11R6/include/X11/SM/SMlib.h # rpm -q xorg-x11-devel xorg-x11-devel-6.8.1-7ct same err

Re: [e-users] e16 cvs build fails...

2005-01-02 Thread Kim Woelders
Compilation was broken when HAVE_X11_SM_SMLIB_H was not set (fixed). It looks like you don't have . /Kim Morten Nilsen wrote: ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr/local --with-x --enable-xinerama --enable-fsstd --enable-esound --disable-rpath ... make ... if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I