Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

2005-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:09:30 -0500 David Coulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > it will come back.. if and when we can get it back. > > What is limiting the availability of the site? Are resources required? if you have someone on the inside of

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

2005-12-17 Thread David Coulson
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > it will come back.. if and when we can get it back. What is limiting the availability of the site? Are resources required? David --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep throu

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

2005-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:44:11 +0900 Jerome Pinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Hi, > It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is deadIt will > come back later or do you have other plan (like superseding byget-e.org) ? > Thanks it will come back.. if and when we can get it back

Re: [e-users] IDEA for nice good looking new clock for E

2005-12-17 Thread DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne
^_^ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:12:29 +0100 schrieb Thomas Kuther: > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:24 +0100 > Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:52:55 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > > > > > Jerome Pinot wrote: > > > > It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

2005-12-17 Thread Tom
[17/12/2005 -- 17:01u] Andreas Volz: > > http://enligthenment.sf.net/ is still up > > An error has been encountered in accessing this page. > > 1. Server: enligthenment.sourceforge.net I'm probably not the first to reply by now, but read that again. :) Cheers, Tom -- "Es bückt sich der Mann,

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

2005-12-17 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:24 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:52:55 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > > > Jerome Pinot wrote: > > > It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is > > > dead > > > > http://enligthenment.sf.net/ is still up > >

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:52:55 +0100 schrieb Morten Nilsen: > Jerome Pinot wrote: > > It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is dead > > http://enligthenment.sf.net/ is still up An error has been encountered in accessing this page. 1. Server: enligthenment.sourceforge.net 2.

Re: [e-users] www.enlightenment.org

2005-12-17 Thread Morten Nilsen
Jerome Pinot wrote: It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is dead http://enligthenment.sf.net/ is still up Cheers, -- Morten :wq --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for pro

[e-users] www.enlightenment.org

2005-12-17 Thread Jerome Pinot
Hi, It's quite a long time now that http://www.enlightenment.org is dead It will come back later or do you have other plan (like superseding by get-e.org) ? Thanks -- Jerome Pinot http://ngc891.blogdns.net/ N�HY޵隊X���'���u���[��� ަ�k��!���W�~�鮆�zk��C� [EMAIL PROTECTED], a{� ��,�H��

Re: [e-users] unresponsive windows

2005-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 05:00:32 -0800 Eric Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Saturday, 17 December 2005 at 20:40:54 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > >On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:40:00 -0800 Eric Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > >> I am using e17 .022 on Arch Linux with Xorg. > >> When i move my

Re: [e-users] unresponsive windows

2005-12-17 Thread Eric Dan
On Saturday, 17 December 2005 at 20:40:54 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: >On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:40:00 -0800 Eric Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > >> I am using e17 .022 on Arch Linux with Xorg. >> When i move my windows around especially big windows, i get this >> redrawing problem as you can se

Re: [e-users] unresponsive windows

2005-12-17 Thread Eric Dan
On Saturday, 17 December 2005 at 20:40:54 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: >On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:40:00 -0800 Eric Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > >> I am using e17 .022 on Arch Linux with Xorg. >> When i move my windows around especially big windows, i get this >> redrawing problem as you can se

Re: [e-users] IDEA for nice good looking new clock for E

2005-12-17 Thread Jason Edson
On 12/15/05, DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a clock i like very much...http://download.freshmeat.net/screenshots/47471.jpgwell the project,s name is gtubeclock and was looking the source and inside is the images of the numbers i think it will be easyfor developers

Re: [e-users] unresponsive windows

2005-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:40:00 -0800 Eric Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > I am using e17 .022 on Arch Linux with Xorg. > When i move my windows around especially big windows, i get this > redrawing problem as you can see on my screenshot: but it fixes itself up? or its just slow? are you using e

[e-users] Re: [E-devel] e16.8 pre1

2005-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:45:51 +0100 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Hi all, > > It may be a bit late for this, e17 lurking just around the corner, but > it looks like there still are a handful of e16 users out there. NEVER late! doing a marvellous job there kwo! :) > Anyway, source t

[e-users] unresponsive windows

2005-12-17 Thread Eric Dan
I am using e17 .022 on Arch Linux with Xorg. When i move my windows around especially big windows, i get this redrawing problem as you can see on my screenshot: http://www.vladuz976.com/screenshot.png Is this the window manger's fault or Xorg or my hardware is not good enough? Arch Linux 0.7.1 X