On Thu, 25 May 2006 23:09:34 -0500 Laurence Vanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Nathan A. Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 17:11 +0200, Morten Nilsen wrote:
> >
> >> Morten Nilsen wrote:
> >>
> >>> 279 pixels wide is the narrowest possible as of right now
> >>>
> >> 313, actu
Nathan A. Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 17:11 +0200, Morten Nilsen wrote:
Morten Nilsen wrote:
279 pixels wide is the narrowest possible as of right now
313, actually.. the blue square disappears at 312px wide
I would suggest that either the default theme make it impossibl
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 17:11 +0200, Morten Nilsen wrote:
> Morten Nilsen wrote:
> > 279 pixels wide is the narrowest possible as of right now
>
> 313, actually.. the blue square disappears at 312px wide
>
> I would suggest that either the default theme make it impossible to
> scale below 313 wide
Personally, I rather like the shelf, and have had only one minor
problem with it - somehow my e settings dumped and
for a day or two the shelf was 2px wide.. It's now back to normal
though.
One suggestion I might have (though I'm sure Raster has already thought
of this, but if not...) I think
