On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:47:36 +0200,
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Yasufumi Haga wrote:
| > On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:58:08 +0200,
| >Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > Thanks a lot for your explanation.
| >
| > | Yasufumi Haga wrote:
| > | > Hi all
| > | >
| > | > I
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:23:22 -0500 MillTek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi,
> Running the latest sources from CVS - just updated a few minutes ago.
> All compiled ok but E will not run. Immediate segfault.
>
> Anyone having this issue??
http://enlightenment.org/Main/Debugging/
:)
--
-
Massimo Maiurana wrote:
> Kim Woelders, il 18/07/2006 23:58, scrisse:
>
>
>>The term "background transparency compatibility mode" is probably not
>>very well chosen, suggestions for a better one are welcome :)
>
>
> maybe something like "pseudotransparency hack for virtual roots"?
>
The hack
Yasufumi Haga wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:58:08 +0200,
>Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for your explanation.
>
> | Yasufumi Haga wrote:
> | > Hi all
> | >
> | > I'm trying to update ja.po file in e16.8.2, and I have an
> | > uncertain entry in the file:
> | >
>
Hi,
Running the latest sources from CVS - just updated a few minutes ago.
All compiled ok but E will not run. Immediate segfault.
Anyone having this issue??
Jim
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
Kim Woelders, il 18/07/2006 23:58, scrisse:
> The term "background transparency compatibility mode" is probably not
> very well chosen, suggestions for a better one are welcome :)
maybe something like "pseudotransparency hack for virtual roots"?
--
Massimo Maiurana massimoragusa
