David Seikel schrieb:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:58:31 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> The first thing was, that e17/libs/eet/src/bin is now empty,
>> is eet-config useless and was that change intentional?
>>
>
> It's all being changed to use pkg-config.
>
>
>> The next thing was, ef
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:58:31 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The first thing was, that e17/libs/eet/src/bin is now empty,
> is eet-config useless and was that change intentional?
It's all being changed to use pkg-config.
> The next thing was, efreet is now required for enlightenment.
> Is this
Hello everyone,
currently i'm doing rebuilds of my e17 packages,
so i noticed some issues in the last few days.
The first thing was, that e17/libs/eet/src/bin is now empty,
is eet-config useless and was that change intentional?
The next thing was, efreet is now required for enlightenment.
Is thi
Berto wrote:
> OK now it compiled.!!
>
> i established the PKG_CONFIG_PATH variable with export to
> /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig
>
Exactly how do you do this? I can't get e to compile either - for the
same reasons.
Thanks,
Jim
> and compiled everything from the beginning
>
> thanks to every
englihtenment_remote is one of the best things in E17, please don't
remove it.
Mirek Slugen
Michael Jones napsal(a):
> Why are the enlightenment_remote commands removed anyways? Personally, I
> like them as it makes it easy to set up scripts to control enlightenment
> to do whatever you want. :-
