Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
> Some rather dated numbers are available on
> http://www.rasterman.com/index.php?page=News
>
> Look for the post from 29 May 2005
Thanks, I did find this, but as you've noted, it's a bit dated. I know
for a fact that e17 of late is much faster then it was, say, a year a
Geoffrey schrieb:
> Does anyone know of a comparison of E to other window managers? I'm
> specifically interested in comparisons of used resources (cpu, memory..)
>
> I've done some googling, but not really found anything.
>
>
raster did some comparisons some years ago (2005). I don't know if
Some rather dated numbers are available on
http://www.rasterman.com/index.php?page=News
Look for the post from 29 May 2005
On 12/6/07, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know of a comparison of E to other window managers? I'm
> specifically interested in comparisons of used resour
Does anyone know of a comparison of E to other window managers? I'm
specifically interested in comparisons of used resources (cpu, memory..)
I've done some googling, but not really found anything.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
tempora
Hi;
After a few months trying other WM's, I've come back to E [1].
I think it is really amazing, and very close to mature (I'm talking
about E17, of course).
Please let me put my item in the wish list: it is possible to tell a
window to be skipped in the pager, but it is not possible to tell it to
