Andreas Volz wrote:
>> Hi Adreas,
>>could you tell me the output of this command?
>> % ls /sys/bus/*/devices/*/temp?_input
>
> Sure,
>
>> ls /sys/bus/*/devices/*/temp?_input
> /sys/bus/platform/devices/w83627hf.656/temp1_input
> /sys/bus/platform/devices/w83627hf.656/temp2_input
>
> regards
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:08:27 +1100
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:13:03 -0500 jack wallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> e17 doesn't support pseudo-transparency - it is a nasty ugly hack and e17
> won't
> be adding such awful workarounds
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:13:03 -0500 jack wallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
e17 doesn't support pseudo-transparency - it is a nasty ugly hack and e17 won't
be adding such awful workarounds into it. use a composite manager and a proper
ARGB32 terminal mode with alpha or don't use e17 :)
> I use at
I use aterm for all of my console needs. In E16 aterm can do
transparency just fine. However in E17 it can not. Is there a reason for
this? Is there a way to change that behavior?
Thanks all.
--
jack wallen, jr. www.monkeypantz.net
"To know recursion, you must first know recursion"
--
