On 12/18/09 14:11, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Geoffrey wrote:
>> On 12/18/09 14:03, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Geoffrey
>>> wrote:
On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 18,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Geoffrey wrote:
> On 12/18/09 14:03, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Geoffrey
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey
wrote:
>
> On 12/1
On 12/18/09 14:03, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Geoffrey wrote:
>> On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey
>>> wrote:
On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Geoffrey wrote:
> On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey
>> wrote:
>>> On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote:
On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote:
> On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wr
On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey wrote:
>> On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote:
>>> On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote:
On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrot
On Friday 18 December 2009 12:27:18 Andreas Plesch wrote:
> Since I had posted about this pager issue which is perhaps a more
> general drag and drop issue, I received confirmation from another E17
> user. Now I want to move this issue along but found that I cannot
> create tickets in the trac syst
Since I had posted about this pager issue which is perhaps a more
general drag and drop issue, I received confirmation from another E17
user. Now I want to move this issue along but found that I cannot
create tickets in the trac system.
Is there another bug tracking mechanism ? Alternatively, coul
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey wrote:
> On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote:
>> On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote:
>>> On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote:
On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote:
> I have 62 tempget processes running on my cur
On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote:
>> On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote:
>>> On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote:
I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install.
Sounds like a bit much. Is that
On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote:
> On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote:
> > On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote:
> >> I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install.
> >> Sounds like a bit much. Is that normal?
> >
> > These are all 'leftovers'
On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote:
>> I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install. Sounds
>> like a bit much. Is that normal?
>>
> These are all 'leftovers' :P
So, should I kill them? Why are the 'leftover?'
--
Until
On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote:
> I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install. Sounds
> like a bit much. Is that normal?
>
These are all 'leftovers' :P
--
This SF.Net email is spons
I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install. Sounds
like a bit much. Is that normal?
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
13 matches
Mail list logo
