Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread Andrea Suisani
On 12/22/2011 08:49 AM, Andrea Suisani wrote: > On 12/22/2011 01:06 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:17:10 +0100 Andrea Suisani >> said: >> >>> L>> No, sorry am not subscribed to the users list. Could you please >>> L>> forward it or encourage the affecte

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread Andrea Suisani
On 12/22/2011 01:06 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:17:10 +0100 Andrea Suisani said: > >> L>> No, sorry am not subscribed to the users list. Could you please >> L>> forward it or encourage the affected user to open a ticket with bt if >> L>> possible? >> R>

Re: [e-users] Segfault when Opening Startup Applications

2011-12-21 Thread Mick
On Thursday 22 Dec 2011 00:13:38 Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:26:05 -0600 Jeff Hoogland said: > > Anyone else getting a segfault when they try to open the start up > > applications configuration? > > nup :( No problem here. I have only gkrellm in the startup apps. However,

Re: [e-users] Segfault when Opening Startup Applications

2011-12-21 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:26:05 -0600 Jeff Hoogland said: > Anyone else getting a segfault when they try to open the start up > applications configuration? nup :( -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com

Re: [e-users] Envision no longer works - pdfs are blank images

2011-12-21 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:18:00 -0600 Jeff Hoogland said: so it was your specific version of libcurl that broke things? (as to whose fault it is - a break in libcurl behavior/api that ecore-con triggered, or ecore-con just being lucky before and now curl changed and ecore-con becomes unlucky?) > Go

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:17:10 +0100 Andrea Suisani said: > L>> No, sorry am not subscribed to the users list. Could you please > L>> forward it or encourage the affected user to open a ticket with bt if > L>> possible? > R> there is no bt - this commit just makes their screens blank - something to

[e-users] Segfault when Opening Startup Applications

2011-12-21 Thread Jeff Hoogland
Anyone else getting a segfault when they try to open the start up applications configuration? -- ~Jeff Hoogland Thoughts on Technology , Tech Blog Bodhi Linux , Enlightenment for your Desktop ---

Re: [e-users] Envision no longer works - pdfs are blank images

2011-12-21 Thread Jeff Hoogland
Got my libcurl issue sorted and am on a current SVN revision again - I can confirm envision works once more. Thanks Daniel! On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jeff Hoogland wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to look into this for me SeoZ - but I cannot > build it current because my EFLs are being

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread mh
On Dec 21, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Andrea Suisani wrote: > [cut] > >> >> Thanks for opening the ticket. > > you're welcome > >> If there is anything else I can provide or test please let me know. > > maybe you should subscribe (temporarily) to e-devel ml > cause AFAIK Leif isn't subscribe to e-us

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread Andrea Suisani
[cut] > > Thanks for opening the ticket. you're welcome > If there is anything else I can provide or test please let me know. maybe you should subscribe (temporarily) to e-devel ml cause AFAIK Leif isn't subscribe to e-users and so we both can provide/test whatever Leif asks for Andrea -

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread Andrea Suisani
>> Ah, no, bt is backtrace. > > sure... silly me :) > thanks again for the pinter s/pinter/pointer Andrea -- Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or po

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread mh
On Dec 21, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Andrea Suisani wrote: > On 12/21/2011 02:50 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: >> 2011/12/21 Andrea Suisani: >>> On 12/21/2011 02:31 PM, mh wrote: On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Suisani wrote: > On 12/20/2011 02:54 PM, Andrea Suisani wrote: >>>

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread Andrea Suisani
On 12/21/2011 03:19 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > 2011/12/21 Andrea Suisani: >> ops... sorry about that >> I'm going to open a ticket then >> >> done >> >> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/947 >> >> >> I had somehow misread this conversation between >> raster (R) and leif (L) >>

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread Sachiel
2011/12/21 Andrea Suisani : > ops... sorry about that > I'm going to open a ticket then > > done > > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/947 > > > I had somehow misread this conversation between > raster (R) and leif (L) > > L>> No, sorry am not subscribed to the users list. Could you pl

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread Andrea Suisani
On 12/21/2011 02:50 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > 2011/12/21 Andrea Suisani: >> On 12/21/2011 02:31 PM, mh wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Suisani wrote: >>> On 12/20/2011 02:54 PM, Andrea Suisani wrote: > On 12/20/2011 02:07 PM, mh wrote: >> That looks like it

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread Sachiel
2011/12/21 Andrea Suisani : > On 12/21/2011 02:31 PM, mh wrote: >> >> On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Suisani wrote: >> >>> On 12/20/2011 02:54 PM, Andrea Suisani wrote: On 12/20/2011 02:07 PM, mh wrote: > That looks like it updates the modules to revision 66220? That's the > firs

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread Andrea Suisani
On 12/21/2011 02:31 PM, mh wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Suisani wrote: > >> On 12/20/2011 02:54 PM, Andrea Suisani wrote: >>> On 12/20/2011 02:07 PM, mh wrote: That looks like it updates the modules to revision 66220? That's the first version I had trouble with. Try 662

Re: [e-users] E still won't start

2011-12-21 Thread mh
On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Suisani wrote: > On 12/20/2011 02:54 PM, Andrea Suisani wrote: >> On 12/20/2011 02:07 PM, mh wrote: >>> That looks like it updates the modules to revision 66220? That's the first >>> version I had trouble with. Try 66218, which worked for me. >> >> oh thanks.