Re: [e-users] Crash on e5

2013-12-07 Thread Steven@e
ZFS on linux is clearly not stable yet. not an option. On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: > On 2013-12-07 22:09, Guillaume Friloux wrote: >> On 07/12/2013 21:05, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: >>> >>> Moving to other FS is not an option. BTRFS that format is not yet >>> completed/f

Re: [e-users] Crash on e5

2013-12-07 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 2013-12-07 22:09, Guillaume Friloux wrote: > On 07/12/2013 21:05, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: >> >> Moving to other FS is not an option. BTRFS that format is not yet >> completed/fully defined, has elementary fsck when not giving needed >> features. ZFS using FUSE is not going to happened on that c

Re: [e-users] Crash on e5

2013-12-07 Thread Guillaume Friloux
On 07/12/2013 21:05, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: > > Moving to other FS is not an option. BTRFS that format is not yet > completed/fully defined, has elementary fsck when not giving needed > features. ZFS using FUSE is not going to happened on that critical host. > > Kernel was a 3.7 and have been upda

Re: [e-users] Crash on e5

2013-12-07 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 2013-12-07 20:30, Christopher Barry wrote: > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 04:20:37 +1000 > David Seikel wrote: > >> On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:11:16 + Mick >> wrote: >> >> > On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 17:22:06 David Seikel wrote: >> > > On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin >> > > >> > > >>

Re: [e-users] Crash on e5

2013-12-07 Thread Christopher Barry
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 04:20:37 +1000 David Seikel wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:11:16 + Mick > wrote: > > > On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 17:22:06 David Seikel wrote: > > > On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >Missing subscribers on git list, e-b0

Re: [e-users] Crash on e5

2013-12-07 Thread David Seikel
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:11:16 + Mick wrote: > On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 17:22:06 David Seikel wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin > > > > > > wrote: > > >Missing subscribers on git list, e-b0rk list entirely corrupted > > > > e-b0rk got borked, think that was just

Re: [e-users] Crash on e5

2013-12-07 Thread Mick
On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 17:22:06 David Seikel wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin > > wrote: > >Missing subscribers on git list, e-b0rk list entirely corrupted > > e-b0rk got borked, think that was just asking for trouble. B-) Perhaps time to move to ZFS? -- Regar

Re: [e-users] Crash on e5

2013-12-07 Thread David Seikel
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin wrote: >Missing subscribers on git list, e-b0rk list entirely corrupted e-b0rk got borked, think that was just asking for trouble. B-) -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in

[e-users] Crash on e5

2013-12-07 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
Hi, This morning e5 have been unavailable for 2 hours and 30 minutes starting at about 10:40 UTC. All is back again, but if you have strange behaviour, please reply (and CC: me). Thanks to thoses who already did. The EXT4 filesystem that host the VMs used for Enlightenment internal and public pu