Re: [e-users] Building E from git with EFL 1.9.2 Release

2014-04-10 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 22:47, Jeff Hoogland wrote: > Is it not going to be possible to build E from git without also using EFL > from GIT any longer? Mike bumped the version in 73c66c8acc8dd58a3525cb721e600e959995a5e9 to 1.9.99 which indeeed means that you would need efl git to build enligh

Re: [e-users] Building E from git with EFL 1.9.2 Release

2014-04-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 22:47:34 -0500 Jeff Hoogland said: > Is it not going to be possible to build E from git without also using EFL > from GIT any longer? assume you are just lucky if e doesnt need git efl. a released e will need the last released efl. stuff in git... is stuff in git. -- --

[e-users] Building E from git with EFL 1.9.2 Release

2014-04-09 Thread Jeff Hoogland
Is it not going to be possible to build E from git without also using EFL from GIT any longer? -- ~Jeff Hoogland Thoughts on Technology , Tech Blog Bodhi Linux , Enlightenment for your Desktop --

Re: [e-users] building e fails - ecore_con_init 60874

2011-07-01 Thread rob
On 30/06/11 18:32, rob wrote: > /usr/bin/ld: e_fm_main.o: undefined reference to symbol 'ecore_con_init' > /usr/bin/ld: note: 'ecore_con_init' is defined in DSO > /usr/local//lib/libecore_con.so.1 so try adding it to the linker > command line > /usr/local//lib/libecore_con.so.1: could not read sy

[e-users] building e fails - ecore_con_init 60874

2011-06-30 Thread rob
/usr/bin/ld: e_fm_main.o: undefined reference to symbol 'ecore_con_init' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'ecore_con_init' is defined in DSO /usr/local//lib/libecore_con.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/local//lib/libecore_con.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld re

[e-users] building e

2007-11-15 Thread Geoffrey
I've not compiled E in a while, and now when I attempt to do so with my 'it used to work' script, it fails. Is there any doc out there that outlines the compilation order? -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neithe

Re: [e-users] Building E from CVS

2006-01-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:29:22 -0600 DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > > 1. e17/libs/eet > > > 2. e17/libs/evas > > > 3. e17/libs/ecore > > > 4. e17/libs/embryo > > > 5. e17/libs/edje > > > > > > 1. e17/apps/e > > > > > > but e ask for edb so i compile it. > > >

Re: [e-users] Building E from CVS

2006-01-09 Thread DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne
> > > > 1. e17/libs/eet > > 2. e17/libs/evas > > 3. e17/libs/ecore > > 4. e17/libs/embryo > > 5. e17/libs/edje > > > > 1. e17/apps/e > > > > but e ask for edb so i compile it. > > e does not ask for edb at all. its an OPTIONAL dependency for evas that it CAN > use if found. it is not needed in

Re: [e-users] Building E from CVS

2006-01-08 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:25:37 -0600 DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > well the last cvs snapshot i compile was since october 2005 well in that time > i compile with this order: > > 1. e17/libs/imlib2 > 2. e17/libs/edb > 3. e17/libs/eet > 4. e17/libs/imlib2_loaders > 5. e1

Re: [e-users] Building E from CVS

2006-01-08 Thread adi
Here is the order i which o compile e17 2 days ago imlib2 edb eet imlib2_loaders evas ecore epeg embryo edje epsilon esmart etox emotion ewl engrave entice elicit entrance e17 e_utils e_modules it is based on what was write on enlightenment.org on Build_Notes... and i just watch for errors and ch

[e-users] Building E from CVS

2006-01-08 Thread DRAKE_Dalfa-TheEnlightenedOne
well the last cvs snapshot i compile was since october 2005 well in that time i compile with this order: 1. e17/libs/imlib2 2. e17/libs/edb 3. e17/libs/eet 4. e17/libs/imlib2_loaders 5. e17/libs/evas 6. e17/libs/ecore 7. e17/libs/epeg 8. e17/libs/embryo 9. e17/libs/edje 10. e17/libs/epsilon 11. e1