Re: [e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:15:22 -0700, James Bowlin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:10 PM, Kim Woelders said: > > The menu resource leakage problem exists in 1.0.5 and 1.0.6, but not > > in 1.0.4 or 1.0.7. > > So, it seems to have been fixed along with other menu related > > problems in 1.0.7 :) >

Re: [e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-21 Thread James Bowlin
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:10 PM, Kim Woelders said: > The menu resource leakage problem exists in 1.0.5 and 1.0.6, but not > in 1.0.4 or 1.0.7. > So, it seems to have been fixed along with other menu related > problems in 1.0.7 :) I've got a ton of e16 menus because I convert all my Firefox bookm

Re: [e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:10:48 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:36:51 +0100, Kim Woelders > wrote: > > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:51:37 +0100, Kim Woelders > > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:38:07 +0100, Dennis Nezic > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:15:35 -05

Re: [e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-21 Thread Kim Woelders
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:38:07 +0100, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:15:35 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:59:40 +0900, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:07:59 -0500 Dennis Nezic >> > said: >> > >> > xrestop >> > >> > use th

Re: [e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-21 Thread Kim Woelders
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:36:51 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:51:37 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > >> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:38:07 +0100, Dennis Nezic >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:15:35 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:59:40 +0900, Carsten Haitz

Re: [e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-21 Thread Kim Woelders
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:51:37 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote: > On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:38:07 +0100, Dennis Nezic > wrote: > >> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:15:35 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: >>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:59:40 +0900, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) >>> wrote: >>> > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:07:59

Re: [e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-20 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:15:35 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:59:40 +0900, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:07:59 -0500 Dennis Nezic > > said: > > > > xrestop > > > > use that to see if anythingis leaking x resources. other than that > > it

Re: [e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-20 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:59:40 +0900, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:07:59 -0500 Dennis Nezic > said: > > xrestop > > use that to see if anythingis leaking x resources. other than that it > may simply be normal glibc memory growth. look at rss not vsize for > an a

Re: [e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:07:59 -0500 Dennis Nezic said: xrestop use that to see if anythingis leaking x resources. other than that it may simply be normal glibc memory growth. look at rss not vsize for an accurate picture - vsize is not relevant, also it could be a server leak of some sort - if xr

[e-users] e(16) and X memory usage

2010-11-19 Thread Dennis Nezic
I'm not sure if this question is appropriate here, but my X always seems to be growing in memory-use -- never shrinking. (Not even if I close everything except for e16 itself.) Do you suppose the window manager has something to do with this? Is there any way to free up this (useless / leaked?) memo