On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:49:53 + Martin Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hello,
>
> i've seen several issues building ecore (lot's of spam about different
> visibility of a real heap of function (all functions? )) which ended up in at
all of these are harmless warnings (if you actually rea
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:35:18 +0900 David Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On 1/3/06, Martin Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > i've seen several issues building ecore (lot's of spam about different
> > visibility
> > of a real heap of function (all functions? )) which
On 1/3/06, Martin Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,i've seen several issues building ecore (lot's of spam about different visibilityof a real heap of function (all functions? )) which ended up in at the end breakingthe whole build process. I assume it was just that certain functions couldn't
I have been watching much discussion in many developer mailing lists
concerning lots of problems with gcc 4. The general consensus seems
to be that gcc 4 is buggy at least, and likely very buggy.
I'm reporting what I read, I've never used gcc 4.
pgpzSuxIoG7Rq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
i've seen several issues building ecore (lot's of spam about different
visibility
of a real heap of function (all functions? )) which ended up in at the end
breaking
the whole build process. I assume it was just that certain functions couldn't be
seen in the library so linking the test pr
