Dennis Nezic wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:19:30 +0100,
>> Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I have changed the window placement code in an attempt to improve
>> placement on crowded desktops and when there are windows with
>> NeverUseArea attributes.
>
> Very cool. Although, I wa
Dennis Nezic wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:19:30 +0100,
>> Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I have changed the window placement code in an attempt to improve
>> placement on crowded desktops and when there are windows with
>> NeverUseArea attributes.
>
> Very cool. Although, I wa
> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:19:30 +0100,
> Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have changed the window placement code in an attempt to improve
> placement on crowded desktops and when there are windows with
> NeverUseArea attributes.
Very cool. Although, I was able to get an overlap once
Kim Woelders wrote:
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:19:28 +0100,
>>> Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dennis Nezic wrote:
Maybe I'm not understanding how the NeverUseArea window toggle flag
works, but shouldn't it force e16 to /never/ place windows in the
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:19:28 +0100,
> Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > Maybe I'm not understanding how the NeverUseArea window toggle flag
> > works, but shouldn't it force e16 to /never/ place windows in the
> > specified area? If so, it doesn't seem to be work
Dennis Nezic wrote:
> Maybe I'm not understanding how the NeverUseArea window toggle flag
> works, but shouldn't it force e16 to /never/ place windows in the
> specified area? If so, it doesn't seem to be working at the moment
> (v0.16.8.11).
>
"never" is a bit strong. It's more like "normally". W
Maybe I'm not understanding how the NeverUseArea window toggle flag
works, but shouldn't it force e16 to /never/ place windows in the
specified area? If so, it doesn't seem to be working at the moment
(v0.16.8.11).
-
This SF.
