Re: [e-users] engage and e16

2007-08-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:17:11 + (UTC) Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:51:38 -0400, Michael Jennings wrote: > > snip... > > > > It's free software. If you think you know what needs to be done, do it. > > > > Michael > > Well, I don't use e17 and don't know EFL, s

Re: [e-users] engage and e16

2007-08-23 Thread Peter
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:51:38 -0400, Michael Jennings wrote: snip... > > It's free software. If you think you know what needs to be done, do it. > > Michael Well, I don't use e17 and don't know EFL, so I would not know what needs to be done. I don't think porting it to gtk or qt is worth the t

Re: [e-users] engage and e16

2007-08-23 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 23 August 2007, at 10:15:35 (+), Peter wrote: > I think that if engage standalone is to survive, it will have to > fork off the existing modular project and become independent. Next, > it will have to have a standardized, non-eap-style, method of > accessing programs and objects.

Re: [e-users] engage and e16

2007-08-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:15:35 + (UTC) Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:19:51 +1000, David Seikel wrote: > > Thanks, Kim and David: > > >> > Am I missing something obvious or is this not a workable combination. > >> > > >> Um... e16 should be compatible with just ab

Re: [e-users] engage and e16

2007-08-23 Thread Peter
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:19:51 +1000, David Seikel wrote: Thanks, Kim and David: >> > Am I missing something obvious or is this not a workable combination. >> > >> Um... e16 should be compatible with just about anything, but engage >> seems to be "somewhat less functional" than it has been. > > E

Re: [e-users] engage and e16

2007-08-22 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:37:29 +0200 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter wrote: > > I realize engage standalone is deprecated. So, before anything, is > > engage compatible with e16? e16 uses composite and I tried starting > > engage with - m 1 -C 1 options. It does seem, to draw a large

Re: [e-users] engage and e16

2007-08-22 Thread Kim Woelders
Peter wrote: > I realize engage standalone is deprecated. So, before anything, is engage > compatible with e16? e16 uses composite and I tried starting engage with - > m 1 -C 1 options. It does seem, to draw a large rectangular area at the > bottom. It does show white areas and mouse over shows a

[e-users] engage and e16

2007-08-21 Thread Peter
I realize engage standalone is deprecated. So, before anything, is engage compatible with e16? e16 uses composite and I tried starting engage with - m 1 -C 1 options. It does seem, to draw a large rectangular area at the bottom. It does show white areas and mouse over shows applications that are