On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:35:35 +0600 Ildar Mulyukov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
this would be incredibly hard to do given the internal structure of e and its
containers, zones and desks. also it would be very problematic - especially if
different screens are different sizes/resolutions. i just don't
On 10.01.2008 18:24:18, Manuel Werlberger wrote:
Hi!
dislike: me++
E is one of the only WM that supports separate switching of virtual
desktops on different monitors. Please stick to that policy.
Hello,
This functionality could be optional.
Best regards, Ildar
--
Ildar
Hi!
dislike: me++
E is one of the only WM that supports separate switching of virtual
desktops on different monitors. Please stick to that policy.
Regards,
Manuel
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 10:35 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
Hi, Rasterman, people!
I've got an idea, but couldn't
On Jan 10, 2008 7:24 AM, Manuel Werlberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
dislike: me++
+++
E is one of the only WM that supports separate switching of virtual
desktops on different monitors. Please stick to that policy.
I concur and would prefer it remain as it is. I personally use
virtual
Hi, Rasterman, people!
I've got an idea, but couldn't understand, where it came from. Now I
know, explanation below.
The idea: the usual configuration is having one monitor and 4
horizontal virtual desktops. Now add an extra monitor to the right of
the first one. Isn't it natural,
On Jan 8, 2008 2:35 AM, Ildar Mulyukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Rasterman, people!
I've got an idea, but couldn't understand, where it came from. Now I
know, explanation below.
The idea: the usual configuration is having one monitor and 4
horizontal virtual desktops. Now add an
