Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread Geoffrey
On 12/18/09 14:11, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Geoffrey wrote: >> On 12/18/09 14:03, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Geoffrey >>> wrote: On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18,

Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread Sachiel
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Geoffrey wrote: > On 12/18/09 14:03, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Geoffrey >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey  wrote: > > On 12/1

Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread Geoffrey
On 12/18/09 14:03, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Geoffrey wrote: >> On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey >>> wrote: On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02

Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread Sachiel
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Geoffrey wrote: > On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey   >> wrote: >>> On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote: On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote: > On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wr

Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread Geoffrey
On 12/18/09 11:39, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey wrote: >> On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote: >>> On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote: On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrot

Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread Sachiel
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Geoffrey wrote: > On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote: >> On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote: >>> On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote: On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote: > I have 62 tempget processes running on my cur

Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread Geoffrey
On 12/18/09 11:26, P Purkayastha wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote: >> On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote: >>> On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote: I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install. Sounds like a bit much. Is that

Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread P Purkayastha
On Friday 18 December 2009 11:20:02 Geoffrey wrote: > On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote: > >> I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install. > >> Sounds like a bit much. Is that normal? > > > > These are all 'leftovers'

Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread Geoffrey
On 12/18/09 10:57, P Purkayastha wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote: >> I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install. Sounds >> like a bit much. Is that normal? >> > These are all 'leftovers' :P So, should I kill them? Why are the 'leftover?' -- Until

Re: [e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread P Purkayastha
On Friday 18 December 2009 10:08:39 Geoffrey wrote: > I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install. Sounds > like a bit much. Is that normal? > These are all 'leftovers' :P -- This SF.Net email is spons

[e-users] temperature processes

2009-12-18 Thread Geoffrey
I have 62 tempget processes running on my current E17 install. Sounds like a bit much. Is that normal? -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin