https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox
On 07/05/19 08:18, Paul Kosinski wrote:
> I had been reluctant to use Firefox spinoffs because I had worried
> about their likely lack of timely bug and (especially) security fixes.
> But this disaster, coupled with the declining power-user-friendliness of
> po
I had been reluctant to use Firefox spinoffs because I had worried
about their likely lack of timely bug and (especially) security fixes.
But this disaster, coupled with the declining power-user-friendliness of
post-XUL versions of Firefox (even ESR), sort of moot that issue for me.
P.s. Waterfox
Both of those are only issues on nightly (Firefox 68), so they won't affect
folks here.
Mike
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 2:16 PM Gage, John wrote:
> Hi Mike and Jason,
>
>
>
> The following bugs are getting a lot of attention currently, and they may
> also have an effect related to the “search setti
Hi Mike and Jason,
The following bugs are getting a lot of attention currently, and they may also
have an effect related to the “search setting / search engine” issues you are
discussing:
-SearchService used before init by session restore / startup and pages with
search engine links
https://bu
Hi Andrew,
> The issue is caused by a certificate expiring.
>The released fix is a work-around which reduces security by not checking the
>addon's signature.
If you have Studies/Normandy enabled, you can go navigate to "about:studies"
and you will see that there is an expired workaround regardi
> Is AutoConfig (from CCK2) effected by this? Group Policy?
No, only if these changes came from an add-on.
We're continuing to investigate.
Mike
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:44 PM Jason Jackson wrote:
> It looks like ESR 60.6.2 fixes extensions but introduces 5 new bugs. Of
> particular note, i
It looks like ESR 60.6.2 fixes extensions but introduces 5 new bugs. Of
particular note, is "Home page or search settings customized by an add-on may
be reset to defaults." Is AutoConfig (from CCK2) effected by this? Group
Policy?
We don't deploy any extensions, but our users may have added
On Sat, 4 May 2019, Karthik Krishnamurthy wrote:
Hello all,
In light of the new add-ons issue, what would be the fate of enterprises
running older versions of Firefox? Our organization runs thousands of
Windows systems with Firefox v61 with a managed add-on installation
using the windows regist
We're investigating what we can do for older versions of Firefox.
Can I ask why you picked 61 instead of the 60 ESR? That seems like an odd
choice.
Mike Kaply
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:42 PM Karthik Krishnamurthy
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In light of the new add-ons issue, what would be the fate
Hello all,
In light of the new add-ons issue, what would be the fate of enterprises
running older versions of Firefox? Our organization runs thousands of
Windows systems with Firefox v61 with a managed add-on installation
using the windows registry method. How is the fix for these older systems
go
10 matches
Mail list logo
