Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] What the heck happened to my addons?

Hello everyone, See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1548973 for a description of the problem and its eventual solution. You can also follow https://twitter.com/mozamo/ for updates on this. Regards, Jorge On 5/3/19 7:34 PM, Stephen Carville (Mozilla List) wrote: On 5/3/19 6:25

[Mozilla Enterprise] Fwd: Legacy add-ons to be disabled on addons.mozilla.org

Hello, You should have received this message if you have legacy add-ons on addons.mozilla.org (AMO), but in case you didn't, here's the email we sent out today explaining the timeline for removing legacy add-ons from the site. Regards, Jorge Villalobos Product Manager - AMO

[Mozilla Enterprise] Switching to JSON for update manifests

Hello, I just published this blog post: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2018/05/10/switching-json-update-manifests/ It explains our plan for phasing out RDF for update manifests in add-ons, both those hosted on AMO and self-hosted. If you're managing your own add-on updates and use update.rdf, pl

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Date of purge of XUL extensions at Addons site?

Agree that addons-dev is the better place for this discussion. I'll just add that you can find the AMO source code in these repos: https://github.com/mozilla/addons-server https://github.com/mozilla/addons-frontend You can manage with just the first one to stand up a site that looks and works lik

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Date of purge of XUL extensions at Addons site?

Windows 10.) > > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 11:17:33 -0600 > Jorge Villalobos wrote: > >> I can confirm that's still our plan. >> >> Jorge Villalobos >> AMO Product Manager >> >> On 2/12/18 4:16 AM, Philipp Madersbacher wrote: >>> Hi, wh

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Date of purge of XUL extensions at Addons site?

I can confirm that's still our plan. Jorge Villalobos AMO Product Manager On 2/12/18 4:16 AM, Philipp Madersbacher wrote: > Hi, where have you heard that? According to > https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2017/10/03/legacy-add-on-support-on-firefox-esr/ > AMO will host legacy addons

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Remote XUL support in Firefox 57/59ESR

The add-on won't work on 57 and above because there's no API to manipulate page permissions or the pref for local XUL access via file:///. There are some workarounds you can do, like set the permissions in a pre-57 version of Firefox, using the add-on, and then copy the permissions.sqlite file in

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Remote XUL support in Firefox 57/59ESR

As far as I know, the permissions and preference that enable remote XUL will still exist. However, there are big changes happening all over the platform that could break XUL applications. So, while I think it will still be possible to load remote XUL applications, there's no guarantee they will wor

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] IETab on Firefox 52 ESR

I responded in the bug. The available options are to ask the developer to update the add-on metadata (I'll give that a try) or use an usigned fork of the add-on. Jorge On 6/1/17 2:39 PM, Mossroy wrote: > Thanks Mike, > > I did not find any relevant bug, so I opened > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Firefox ESR 52.1.0 - Adobe Flash Outdated on Enterprise Linux 7?

The latest Flash plugin block covers up to version 25.0.0.163, which is detailed on this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1363513 It could be a problem of the plugin misreporting its version number. You can look for that data on about:plugins Jorge On 5/17/17 11:01 AM, James M.

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Firefox future

It's inherently impossible for CTR to work as an add-on past 57. Here are some posts with information on our plans: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2017/02/16/the-road-to-firefox-57-compatibility-milestones/ https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2016/11/23/add-ons-in-2017/ Jorge On 4/24/17 1:01 PM, Pa

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Is Firefox still issuing ESR's? If so, how do I get it, & what version?

Hello, Yes, you can download the latest ESR from this page: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/ Current version is 52, and you can find the release calendar here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar Regards, Jorge On 4/10/17 12:00 PM, Claude Kacser wrote: > Is Firef

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Mozilla Firefox 45.2.0 ESR blocking latest flash on linux as outdated?

Please add a comment to this bug report so we can investigate it: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1280125 Version 11.2.202.626 shouldn't be blocked. Jorge On 7/1/16 7:17 AM, Cyndi Ervin wrote: > As a user of Firefox I can say that this problem is very evident. I really > want to us

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Extension "could not be verified" warning when installed globally?

It's not a security issue, so it doesn't qualify for uplift to ESR. I'll see if we can do something about this. Jorge On 4/6/16 7:46 AM, Kaply Consulting wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Kasper, Ryan V > wrote: > > Thanks as always Mike! > >

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Which British English dictionary do people use?

On 2/11/16 10:55 AM, Pete Boyd wrote: > It seems rude of Mozilla to just remove the page rather than give an > explanation of why it has gone, and preferably a recommendation as to > the logical dictionary to migrate to. If you go to [1], you'll see a message that the author disabled the listing.

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] ESR Release Schedule

Web Browser Component Manager > The Boeing Company > > -Original Message- > From: Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Jorge > Villalobos > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 8:49 AM > To: Ashley Shreves; enterprise@mozilla.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] ESR Release Schedule

You can find the complete release schedule for Firefox and ESR here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar Regards, Jorge On 2/4/16 9:42 AM, Ashley Shreves wrote: > Who may I ask what the latest Firefox version is out there? > > > > Secondly, what is the ESR release schedule? Or c