I don't know if there's an ability to pre-whitelist domains. uBlock Origin
has a "deploying uBlock Origin" wiki page that shows how to pre-set some
things, maybe it has the ability to modify the whitelist:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Deploying-uBlock-Origin
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 11:17 P
This extension lets you define a default location for new bookmarks:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/default-bookmark-folder/
Beyond that, there's bug 1432604 (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1432604), which just landed in
Nightly builds a few days ago for what will be
My understanding is that "Remote Settings" is the system Firefox is using
to synchronize and distribute preference changes and localized messages
between all of the various processes Firefox is using these days as a
multi-process browser.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020, 9:50 PM Timo Pietilä wrote:
> What a
They can change prefs remotely via SHIELD studies, but I don't think that's
what's happening here. This feels like something got confused with the
site's content security policy or the x-frame-options headers, making
Firefox unable to display the embedded content.
Opening the web console (ctrl-shi
It sounds like these preferences need to be read very early in the browser
startup process in order to be useful, and the point in the startup process
where the GPO settings get enforced is too late (and the browser already
has loaded the non-GPO values).
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 10:50 PM Luca Mangan
My understanding is that the policy values correspond to their preference
equivalents (they start with `security.ssl3.` in about:config).
Firefox itself will be disabling the insecure ciphers by default as time
passes, but these policies can control that for enterprises that still need
to use thos
Looks like https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1551798 landed for
Firefox 69. I haven't looked closely to see if it changed the behavior for
everything or if it's still hidden behind a preference, but there should be
most of that information in the bug or in its dependencies.
On Tue, Jan
According to the spec, json key names should be unique, so naming them all
"comment" is discouraged. However, I think most browser JS engines accept
the duplicate keys but only return the most recent key/value pair when
requested (so json["comment"] would only return the bottom-most "comment"
entry
The fix for that bug landed for Firefox 61, so it will be in ESR68.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:16 AM wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
>
>
> Do you know if this will be fixed in ESR 68 ?
>
> Thank you very much for your answer
>
>
>
> Cordialement / Best regards,
>
> [image: http://www.orange.com/sirius/logo
According to the release calendar, Firefox 68 will be the next major ESR
version, shipping on 2019-07-09. ESR 68.2.0 marks the end of the new
cycle's overlap with the end of ESR 60's support, shipping on 2019-10-22.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018, 1:04 AM Craig Edwards Hi,
>
> Great news, when can we expect
May be bad form, but I don't think there's anything technically stopping
you from installing 64-bit Firefox into "Program Files (x86)" and just
letting the shortcuts continue to point there.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Jason Jackson wrote:
> So I have my ESR 60 (64-bit) configuration ready,
It's possible that the multiprocess features enabled for more users between
52 and 60 are causing increased memory usage. Does RAM usage behave better
if you change the "content process limit" preference in the General >
Performance section of Firefox's options screen down from the default value
to
Looks like right now you'll need to use the Nightly build, which was linked
at the end of the signup process as
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/desktop/#nightly
Sounds like the Beta version of Firefox 60 will be released sometime
tomorrow.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:43 PM, anny00784
Last I heard, anything from 57 and newer (until Mozilla decides to stop)
will be branded as "Quantum". 59ESR will contain several parts of the
Quantum project.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 2:06 AM, William Spratt
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Stupid question: 59.0 ESR is going to be Quantum, yes?
>
>
>
>
I believe this comes from the Heartbeat service. Changing
browser.selfsupport.url to an empty string would likely stop it from working.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:58 PM -0800, "Warren Sanders"
mailto:wsan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm looking for a preference or other to silence this offer in the E
15 matches
Mail list logo