> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John
> Pattenden
> Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 12:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: EOS Why doesn't my 1.4 50mm or my 2.8 70-200L
>
>
> this sounds like a perception and relative view
this sounds like a perception and relative viewing problem.
Resolution through the view finder is quite different than that of the
film. we can much more easily percieve degress of focus in a print than
throught the view finder. Things that are obviously out of focus will
appear that way both thr
| Correct again. I have done some more focused observations based on the
| comments posted here and indeed I have discovered that the field is
| not in focus as much as I had thought it was (strange how my
| perception based on informal use was different than when I really
| focused (pardon the p
> Greg Lynch wrote:
> >I've never ever on ANY camera
> >had the viewfinder show me what's in and out of focus without using DOF
> >Preview. Unless the whole image is out of focus. Part of the viewfinder
> >image in focus, and the rest out of focus (like when the autofocus fails)
> >is something
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:44:07 +0100, Gerry Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Greg Lynch wrote:
>>I've never ever on ANY camera
>>had the viewfinder show me what's in and out of focus without using DOF
>>Preview. Unless the whole image is out of focus. Part of the viewfinder
>>image in focus, a
Just received this in my inbox:
To: 'Paul Prior MD' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and
action t
aken.
From: System Attendant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 17:18:17 +0100
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive conte
On 18 Nov 00 at 8:53, Mike Carroccio wrote:
> HELP...
>
> I seem to have lost the link to the WEB page where I can adjust the
> parameters for this mailing list. Would someone please forward this to me.
> Thanks...Mike
The web-interface you are thinking of only existed with the previous
Mailman
>
>
> From: "Daniel Rocha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: EOS Re: VR vs IS !
>
>
>
> I believe that it is usefull for Canon users to know what is happening
> outside.
I agree.
> I am a Canon EOS 1V user and, besides, a Nikon F-5 user, so not suspicious
> of any bias. I have the 100-400 I
> >Will the Canon Teleconverters work properly with other lens'
> >than the L series?
> >Nate
> no, the elements poke out too far from the bayonet.
Indeed:
but stick on a 13mm or 25mm extension tube and they work fine: at
least that's how I get my 100 macro lens to yield 2.5:1 magnification.
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Nathan D Burns wrote:
| >
| > Will the Canon Teleconverters work properly with other lens'
| > than the L series?
| > Nate
|
| No. The front element of the tc extends outward and the L lenses can
| accept this but the others can
Greg Lynch wrote:
>I've never ever on ANY camera
>had the viewfinder show me what's in and out of focus without using DOF
>Preview. Unless the whole image is out of focus. Part of the viewfinder
>image in focus, and the rest out of focus (like when the autofocus fails)
>is something totally fo
--
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 23:00:00 +0100
From: "Daniel Rocha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: EOS Re: VR vs IS !
De : Robert Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That means they gained more then 3 stops!! Well, it
> always depends on the standard you set. At least it is
> the
Nathan D Burns wrote:
>
> Will the Canon Teleconverters work properly with other lens'
> than the L series?
> Nate
No. The front element of the tc extends outward and the L lenses can
accept this but the others can not.
Bob
--
//
( 0 0 )
-73 de [EMA
John -
I find it very useful for my macro photography (which I usually bounce off
something). If the ambient light is dark, you have a good sense of where
shadows are falling. If the ambient light is high, then you really can't
see it that much.
KN
*
***
no, the elements poke out too far from the bayonet.
>Will the Canon Teleconverters work properly with other lens'
>than the L series?
>Nate
John Pattenden
MacSourcery
Visit Blinky and pick up a crispy treat..
http://www.macscreensavers.com
*
***
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:06:19 +0800, "Greg Lynch"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I can't believe this discussion has gotten so esoterical--learn how to use
>the DOF preview button (that's not the same thing as the CF) and what it is
>telling you, and just push the damned thingI've never ever on A
Will the Canon Teleconverters work properly with other lens'
than the L series?
Nate
Nathan D Burns
Gustine, CA
Nathanb @writeme.com
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/mar
HELP...
I seem to have lost the link to the WEB page where I can adjust the
parameters for this mailing list. Would someone please forward this to me.
Thanks...Mike
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*
>> "Julian Loke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> http://www02.bhphotovideo.com/FrameWork/charts/comp_canslr_1.html
>> According to that B&H chart, the Elan 7 does not have AE lock.
>> Can this be true?
> "Darrell Dorsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like an error, further down the list they
> < small amount of diffuse light given off.>>
>
>
> Chuck
>
> Surely you mant to say
>
> Since no objects are completely black, there will
>
I'm not sure if that's what he mant to say.
All objects that we consider black do reflect some light. Comletely black
objects only exist in theory (o
De : Julian Loke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> According to that B&H chart, the Elan 7 does not have AE lock.
> Can this be true?
It's false !
See the specs at a most precise website !
The button "*" is for the AE Lock.
:)
-- PhOTo - vOYAGe - GrAPhiSMe --
Portail : http://perso.magic.fr/drocha
*
**
<
http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
I have heard it is very heavy and slow in auto focus. In a recent "meet the
rep" @ my local camera store I asked the rep about more vr lenses and the
answer was," we are back logged on the 8-400 for a year and we can not make
any more of any kind since we are backed up" so the Nikon fans must wait
De : Robert Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That means they gained more then 3 stops!! Well, it
> always depends on the standard you set. At least it is
> the same for IS and VR.
yes, the most important thing is that it's the same for both IS & VR :)
-- PhOTo - vOYAGe - GrAPhiSMe --
Portail : h
--- Bradley Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is a Canon list and only Canon pertains
> to this list. Is this a
> Nikon list or a Canon list?
>
> If we could, let us EOS users put "pissing
> distance" aside and look at what
> is available to us.
I do agree with you that this is a Ca
25 matches
Mail list logo
