Jim davis wrote:
> Well, rainy season finally finished here and I got to shoot in
> sunshine for the first time in ages. Got some shots with early morning
> backlight on page 2 that I'm pretty happy with..
Jim,
I especially enjoyed your heron/egret shots, and I would choose your
reflection shots
--- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, a digital camera like the 10d just makes
> things so much more
> fun and easy, with excellent results. I always hated
> scanning, getting
> film processed, etc. Not to mention I take more
> shots now with digital
> and that makes a huge diffe
Some really nice shots there.I particularly like "Egret Landed" and the
Kingfishers. Rarely see two of them together around here, they seem pretty
solitary. Your composition in both of these shots is really nice - a
balance of formal and spontaneous. Thanks for sharing.
Ken
*
*
Well, rainy season finally finished here and I got to shoot in
sunshine for the first time in ages. Got some shots with early morning
backlight on page 2 that I'm pretty happy with..
http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/galleries/new_stuff/new_stuff.html
http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/galleries/new_stuff/n
Thanks guys,
I said that it was subjective, and obviously I was right.
I used the Prime as an example, because it is a similar price to the 8000F.
Canon never released the 2720FS in the UK, so if I go for a film scanner, I
will probably go with the Minolta Scan Dual III.
Pricewise, this would com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Scott
> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 1:29 PM
> To: EOS list
> Subject: RE: EOS Off Topic - Flatbed vs Film Scanners
>
>
> >Flatbeds are really bad film scanners. Use the scanner that is
> appropr
>Flatbeds are really bad film scanners. Use the scanner that is appropriate
>for the media, flatbeds for paper, FILM scanners for FILM.
This statement needs to be qualified. It might have been true for
consumer scanners (though some of the latest flatbeds give very good
results). However, comm
Good points. I went with a Canon FS4000 and a Epson 1200, one for film and
one for "reflective arts". The Espon is cheap (C$110 new) and effective. You
don't need any higher res for printing arts.
One more practical problem of using flatbed for films: when you try the
super high res on flatbed, t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Davis
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: EOS Off Topic - Flatbed vs Film Scanners
>
>
> "Chip Louie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>
> >Flatbeds are
Hi,
> Anyone seen one, have one, or used one recently??? I got one
> from B&H in about '97 but it didn't fit my camera and I
> returned it. For quite a while it was listed as
> "Discontinued" on the B&H website. I'm trying to convince
> myself I'm not the victim of an international conspir
10 matches
Mail list logo
