Hey, get some used Canon lenses, save a bundle.
Following on the above comment, is keh.com a reliable way to buy used lenses? I am in
Italy, but in the next 10 days someone in the US could buy it for me and bring it back
to Rome.
I have been looking at the 28-80 f/2.8-4 L which has an excel
Hi:
I used this lens and the results are pretty good. My copy is slight warm
but slightly sharper than 28-105.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 10:54 AM
Subject: EOS Canon EF 28-70 f/3.5-4.5
> All,
>
> Has anyone u
All,
Has anyone used this lens?
I found a used one for 120 euros.
Would this lens be very disappointing, or would it give decent pictures?
I know it won't be as good as a prime but the 3.5 - 4.5 range is not too bad.
I also found a 20-35 f/2.8 L for 630 euros. Is that a fair price? From reviews
Need is why I currently run three different camera systems:)
Can get horridly expensive though.
Good luck!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Meyer
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 6:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: EOS Arrgh! I wan
<>
By the way, I was receiving error 99 on my 10D and returned
it to Canon. They replaced the shutter and returned it within two weeks. I
was impressed.
--
Roger Skully
<>
Was this under warranty?
If not - how much?
Good light
Grega
_
I believe Sigma has introduced a digital small sensor only 18-135mm, which
would approximate a 28-200 in 35mm terms. Details are on their website.
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl
On Jul 12, 2004, at 8:47 AM, Roger Skully wrote:
I have forgotten what the symbols on this IS lens mean. There is a
vertical
bar | and a circle o on the lens. Which symbol turns on the image
stabilization. By the way, I was receiving error 99 on my 10D and
returned
it to Canon. They replaced the
I have forgotten what the symbols on this IS lens mean. There is a vertical
bar | and a circle o on the lens. Which symbol turns on the image
stabilization. By the way, I was receiving error 99 on my 10D and returned
it to Canon. They replaced the shutter and returned it within two weeks. I
was imp
Hi all,
it has been avhile, but now I'm back ;)
Good light
Grega
_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
*
***
*
--- Ken Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that the 1D-Mk-II has been out for a short
> while, are there any comments
> about this digital body?
snip
Ken:
At least some of your questions are answered in the
review at dpreview.com.
HTH,
=
Bob Meyer
I wish I knew what I know now, when I w
--- "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Canon's new 28-300mm sounds like the ticket. Or if
> that
> is too pricey their older 28-200mm is a pretty
> decent
> lens.
The 28-300 is undoubtedly a very good lens, but if my
28-70 isn't wide enough, the 28-300 isn't going to
help
--- Robert Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, this is just an observation (own Canon and
> Olympus), but if that is
> your big need, pick up an Olympus E-1 and the
> 14-54mm lens.
A very nice camera and lens, undoubtably. And if one
lens was all I needed maybe I'd make the switch. But
C
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:52:24 +0200, you wrote/replied to:
>I am hesitating between
>
>20-35 f/3.5-4.5 $370 or 28 2.8 $170 or 35 2 $230 or 20 2.8 $420 (for wide
>angle shots since I live in Rome)
>Tamron 28-75 2.8 di $350 or 28-135 IS $410 (for vacations one lens solution)
>85mm 1.8 $340 or 70-200
Now that the 1D-Mk-II has been out for a short while, are there any comments
about this digital body? Good or bad points, or suggestions would be good
to hear from people who have had the chance to use it first hand.
Some of the info I would like to hear include if it would be worthwhile to
get t
On Friday July 9 2004 4:18 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I second this request. When shooting film, I found a 28-135 is a great one
> lens on the camera when going light was required. Otherwise, I would take a
> 28-70 and 100-400 is. With the 10D, nothing provides this general use
> coverage. I wo
My camera did focus, but it could not longer raise the entire mirror.
Part of the mirror would go up, but part remained down. It left for
Canon in Irvine already. Canon should have it Monday, and they tell me
that they have a 10 to 12 day turnaround time.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 09:33:20AM -0600
Remind me to never again speak of my cameras reliability. About ten
minutes ago, at image 240_4093, my camera lost the ability to autofocus while
I was using it. I popped the battery for about 30 seconds, but no luck.
So I came to work, removed the battery and offloaded the card to see if
it was
On Friday July 9 2004 7:01 pm, Gary Fisher wrote:
> Mind you
> this wasn't the only flash problem,
> but canon improved flash metering on
> the 10D by reverting to centre-weighted
> metering for flash.
In the "P" or "Program" mode on the Rebel (300D) the eposure is
center-weighted as well, using
I have a budget of about $1,200.
I have a Rebel 2000 body and a SLIK tripod.
I had a 28-80 kit lens, a Digital Rebel and a 85mm 1.8 which were stolen.
The only one I will miss is the 85mm. The rebel was nice, but there were a
few things I wished it had, like choosing AF (AI Servo, One shot, etc.),
On 10 Jul 2004 at 13:40, Terje Thøgersen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have the possibility to purchase an EF 80-200/2.8L
> at an attractive price. However, the tripod-mount is
> not included.
>
> Do alternatives exist? Are any of the current EF
> mounts compatible? Can a mount from an *FD* 300/4.0
> be
20 matches
Mail list logo
