Re: EOS-Digesttoday

On 3/9/05, Félix López de Maturana, discombobulated, unleashed: >Here are my last pictures > > >http://www.photo.net/photos/fmaturana Wow. A lot of stuff there. Your architectural studies are strong. Some that stand out for me:

Re: EOS-Digesttoday

On 3/9/05, F=E9lix L=F3pez de Maturana, discombobulated, unleashed: Fine! That means that enthusiam has nothing to do with the relative importance of the brand and by no means I say Pentax is not important but probably the number of users could be clearly lesser than Eos ones. Point well taken. H

Wide-angle & DSLR (was: EOS Moving to Canon for Digital

On 3 Sep 2005 at 17:17, Keith Green wrote: > Cotty wrote: > > > > On 2/9/05, James B.Davis, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > >>I haven't checked into using other makers' lenses on EOS cameras but > >>generally I thought infinity focus was lost. Perhaps there is a place > >>then for the odd other

Re: EOS-Digesttoday!

On 3/9/05, Ken Durling, discombobulated, unleashed: >Yes, me too. I really like the bee-on-bud pic - love the way the >blurred flower orb makes a BG for the bee. Unusual shot of a common subject. Thanks for the kind words Ken. I tried it without the bee but we all like a bug eh ;-) > >OK, I'll

Re: EOS-Digesttoday!

On 3/9/05, Bob, discombobulated, unleashed: >I like the picture and the idea posting some pix here. Thanks. Well, after all, that's what it's all about. Some lists have PAW (Picture A Week) postings, and some have PESO postings (PIcture Every So Often) with the acronyms in the subject line

Re: EOS-Digesttoday!

Yes, me too. I really like the bee-on-bud pic - love the way the blurred flower orb makes a BG for the bee. Unusual shot of a common subject. OK, I'll share a recent shot that I was pleased with. Elan 7/EF28-135 IS/XP2 Super - this is a scan from the negative on a Canon FS2710. The print

Re: EOS-Digesttoday!

Cotty wrote: On 3/9/05, Félix López de Maturana, discombobulated, unleashed: Fine! That means that enthusiam has nothing to do with the relative importance of the brand and by no means I say Pentax is not important but probably the number of users could be clearly lesser than Eos ones.

Re: EOS-Digesttoday!

On 3/9/05, Félix López de Maturana, discombobulated, unleashed: >Fine! That means that enthusiam has nothing to do with the relative >importance of the brand and by no means I say Pentax is not important but >probably the number of users could be clearly lesser than Eos ones. Point well taken. H

Re: EOS Moving to Canon for Digital

On 3/9/05, Keith Green, discombobulated, unleashed: >The one area where I see criticism of Canon's lenses is when wide-angles are >used on a full-frame sensor. Hi Keith, Yah I have read that. Wish I had a full frame sensor to do some tests :-) > >The argument seems to be that because the light

Re:EOS-Digesttoday!

Hey Felix, you must be joking. The Pentax list has - wait for it - anywhere between 200 and 400 per day. *That* is heavy! Fine! That means that enthusiam has nothing to do with the relative importance of the brand and by no means I say Pentax is not important but probably the number of users c

Re: EOS Moving to Canon for Digital

Cotty wrote: On 2/9/05, James B.Davis, discombobulated, unleashed: I haven't checked into using other makers' lenses on EOS cameras but generally I thought infinity focus was lost. Perhaps there is a place then for the odd other maker lens. I could use a Pentax 15mm like that too. Is that a P