Hi Peter,
> Film is different than sensors.
Er, yes, of course.
> Did you read the article?
Yes.
Regards,
Austin
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list
Peter...
I don't see how that is possible. The exact same framed image will
result in the higher megapixel camera having more pixels in any given
area than the lower one.
Another way to run the thought experiment (really restating some of
the points below):
Put a 5D and a Xti both on tr
No Austin. If you and I take an image and I use a 10MP sensor on say a Rebel
XTi and that is half frame camera. And you use one with 12.7 that is full
frame, and let us say we take the same exact image of a group of people. I will
have more pixels covering a small face in the crowd than you will
Film is different than sensors. Did you read the article?
- Original Message
From: Austin Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: eos@a1.nl
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 3:30:39 PM
Subject: RE: EOS A slightly silly query
Hi Peter,
> No Austin. If you and I take an image and I use a 10MP sens
Hi Peter,
> No Austin. If you and I take an image and I use a 10MP sensor on
> say a Rebel XTi and that is half frame camera. And you use one
> with 12.7 that is full frame, and let us say we take the same
> exact image of a group of people. I will have more pixels
> covering a small face in the c
I am surprised that there are no threads devoted to the new Canon
MKIII series. Other forums are becoming quite active in discussing
alleged problems with AF, and I would love to hear the experiences of
the "pros" who frequent this site.
Any issues so far with members who have had any experie
Hi Peter,
> On the other hand, the pixels density of the 30D and potentially
> the 10MP 40D is greater than the 5D. You have more pixels
> covering the same area of an image taken side-by-side and framed
> identically.
It depends on what you mean by "framed identically". A 10MP sensor, no
matter
